Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Sessions Case No.137/2011 for Offences Under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC Due to Compromise Between Parties. Court Permits Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences Where Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary, Applying Guidelines from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 89
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Vilas Nimbaji Shinde, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of Sessions Case No.137/2011 arising out of C.R. No.87/2011 registered at Shindkheda Police Station, Dhule, for offences under Sections 307, 326, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The applicant, along with the injured witness Kailas Barku Patil and the original complainant, filed a joint affidavit before the High Court, affirming that they had amicably settled the dispute out of court. The parties appeared before the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court, were identified by their advocates, and admitted the correctness of the affidavit contents and their signatures. The Registrar's report was placed on record. The Court noted that the compromise was genuine and voluntary, and that the chances of conviction were remote. Applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, the Court held that to secure the ends of justice, the proceedings could be quashed. The Court allowed the application, quashed the Sessions Case and all related proceedings, and made the rule absolute.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Proceedings - Compromise in Non-Compoundable Offences - Section 482 CrPC - The Court considered whether proceedings for offences under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC could be quashed based on a compromise. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a joint affidavit. The Court, relying on the principles in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, held that where the settlement is genuine and voluntary, and the chances of conviction are bleak, the High Court may quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences to secure the ends of justice. (Paras 1-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the application, quashed Sessions Case No.137/2011 and all proceedings arising out of C.R. No.87/2011 registered with Shindkheda Police Station, Dhule. Rule made absolute.

Law Points

  • Compromise in non-compoundable offences
  • Quashing of criminal proceedings
  • Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC
  • Settlement between parties
  • Voluntary compromise
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (12) 8

Criminal Application No.4823 of 2014

2014-12-23

S.S. Shinde, N.W. Sambre

Mr. N.L. Chaudhari for Applicant, Mr. R.S. Shinde for Respondent No.3, Mr. D.V. Tele, APP for Respondent – State

Vilas s/o. Nimbaji Shinde

The State of Maharashtra, The Superintendent of Police, Dhule, Arun s/o. Sitaram Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of Sessions Case No.137/2011 arising out of FIR No.87/2011 for offences under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Sessions Case No.137/2011 and all related proceedings.

Filing Reason

The parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court and sought quashing of criminal proceedings.

Issues

Whether criminal proceedings for non-compoundable offences under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant, injured witness, and original complainant filed a joint affidavit stating that they have amicably settled the dispute out of court. The parties appeared before the Registrar (Judicial) and admitted the correctness of the affidavit. The compromise is genuine and voluntary.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the parties have genuinely and voluntarily settled the dispute, and the chances of conviction are bleak, the High Court may quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice, following the principles in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.

Judgment Excerpts

The complainant and injured both have admitted that, they have amicably settled the dispute out of the Court and the complainant and injured admitted their signatures appearing on their affidavits. In the affidavit filed jointly, it is stated that, there is compromise between the parties.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Criminal Application No.4823 of 2014 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of Sessions Case No.137/2011 arising out of C.R. No.87/2011. The parties filed a joint affidavit of compromise. The matter was heard and disposed of on 23.12.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 326, 504, 506
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Sessions Case No.137/2011 for Offences Under Sections 307, 326, 504, 506 IPC Due to Compromise Between Parties. Court Permits Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences Where Settlement is Genui...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Probation Granted to Accused in Assault Case — No Error Found in Sessions Judge's Order. Benefit of Probation under Section 4 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 upheld for accused convicted under Secti...