Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Add Legal Submission on Non-Joinder of Necessary Party in Copyright Infringement Suit. The court permitted the defendant to amend its written statement to raise a legal submission that the suit is bad for non-joinder of a necessary party, based on facts already pleaded.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 121
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant in a copyright infringement suit seeking to amend its written statement. The plaintiff, Ultra Merchandise & Retails Limited, sued the defendant, In Entertainment India Limited, for unauthorized telecasts of its television programmes or films. The defendant filed a written statement on 27th March 2014, asserting that the illicit broadcasts were made not by the defendant but by its franchisee, Rajendra Pandey, and that the defendant had terminated the franchise agreement. Issues were framed by consent on 4th April 2014. The defendant then sought to amend the written statement to add a legal submission that the suit was bad for non-joinder of a necessary party (the franchisee). The plaintiff opposed the amendment, arguing it was barred by law and impermissible. The court, after hearing both counsel and considering authorities, allowed the Chamber Summons. The court noted that no new facts were proposed; the amendment was purely a legal submission based on facts already pleaded. The court held that the amendment was unobjectionable and permitted it, emphasizing that it was not examining the merits of the proposed submission at this stage. The judgment was reserved on 11th September 2014 and pronounced on 24th September 2014.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Amendment of Written Statement - Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Legal Submission - The defendant sought to amend its written statement to add a legal submission that the suit was bad for non-joinder of a necessary party, based on facts already pleaded. The court allowed the amendment, holding that no new facts were introduced and the amendment was purely legal. (Paras 1-6)

B) Copyright Law - Infringement - Necessary Party - The suit involved copyright infringement for unauthorized telecasts. The defendant claimed the broadcasts were by its franchisee, not itself. The court permitted the defendant to raise the issue of non-joinder of the franchisee as a necessary party. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a defendant should be permitted to amend its written statement to add a legal submission regarding non-joinder of a necessary party based on facts already pleaded.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Chamber Summons allowed; defendant permitted to amend written statement as sought.

Law Points

  • Amendment of pleadings
  • Order VI Rule 17 CPC
  • non-joinder of necessary party
  • legal submission not new facts
  • liberal approach to amendments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (09) 101

Chamber Summons (L) No. 1106 of 2014 in Suit No. 2101 of 1996

2014-09-24

G.S. Patel, J.

Mr. Rashmin Khandekar, a/w Mr. Ravi Suryavanshi, Mr. Sankalp Dalal i/b M/s. Naik, Naik & Co. for the Plaintiff; Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar, a/w Ms. Amruta Hajarnis i/b M/s. Dave & Girish & Co. for the Defendant

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for copyright infringement and Chamber Summons for amendment of written statement

Remedy Sought

Defendant seeks leave to amend its written statement to add a legal submission that the suit is bad for non-joinder of a necessary party

Filing Reason

Defendant wants to add a legal submission based on facts already pleaded in the written statement

Previous Decisions

Issues were framed by consent on 4th April 2014

Issues

Whether the defendant should be permitted to amend its written statement to add a legal submission regarding non-joinder of a necessary party based on facts already pleaded.

Submissions/Arguments

Defendant submits that the amendment is purely legal and no new facts are added, and is unobjectionable. Plaintiff opposes, arguing that the amendment is barred by law and wholly impermissible.

Ratio Decidendi

An amendment to a written statement that introduces only a legal submission based on facts already pleaded, without adding new facts, is permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, and the court should allow such amendment liberally.

Judgment Excerpts

This case is a needlessly large storm in a very small teacup. The Defendant only seeks leave to add a legal submission based on facts already exhaustively pleaded.

Procedural History

Suit filed in 1996 for copyright infringement. Written statement filed on 27th March 2014. Issues framed on 4th April 2014. Chamber Summons filed for amendment. Judgment reserved on 11th September 2014 and pronounced on 24th September 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order I Rule 13, Order VI Rule 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compassionate Appointment — No Right to Claim After Lapse of Scheme and Inordinate Delay. The court held that compassionate appointment is not a vested right and cannot be granted under a laps...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement to Add Legal Submission on Non-Joinder of Necessary Party in Copyright Infringement Suit. The court permitted the defendant to amend its written statement to raise a legal submission that the su...