Bombay High Court Quashes Section 145 CrPC Proceedings Against Petitioner in Property Dispute — Civil Suit Pending Over Same Property Renders Criminal Proceedings Unwarranted. Initiation of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 based on police report without satisfaction of imminent breach of peace is unsustainable when civil suit regarding title and possession is already pending.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 110
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shaikh Wajid S/o Abdul Gani, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad, seeking to quash proceedings initiated under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) by the Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmedpur, based on a police report dated 31.10.2013. The dispute pertained to plot no.1 out of survey no.86/2 situated at Ahmedpur, which was purchased jointly by the petitioner and the complainant, Shivkant Lasune, on 29.04.2010. Subsequently, on 24.05.2010, one Gundappa Vishwanath Nijwante filed Regular Civil Suit No. 03/2010 challenging the sale deed and seeking declaration of ownership and injunction, which was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur. During the pendency of the civil suit, the complainant sold his interest in the property to the petitioner through an agreement of sale on 20.01.2012 for Rs. 21,000/-. The petitioner constructed 15 tin sheds on the plot and obtained a No Objection Certificate from the Municipal Council, Ahmedpur on 23.08.2012, and an electric connection from M.S.E.B. On 28.07.2013, the complainant filed a complaint against the petitioner and his family members, leading to action under Section 107 CrPC. On 31.10.2013, the Police Officer, Police Station, Ahmedpur submitted a report to the Taluka Executive Magistrate recommending action under Section 145 CrPC. The petitioner contended that the initiation of proceedings under Section 145 CrPC was unwarranted as a civil suit regarding the same property was already pending, and the police report did not indicate any imminent breach of peace. The court, after hearing the parties, held that when a civil suit is pending, the Executive Magistrate should not initiate proceedings under Section 145 CrPC, as the dispute is essentially civil in nature. The court further held that the police report must show an imminent breach of peace, and the Magistrate must apply his mind before initiating proceedings. The court quashed the proceedings under Section 145 CrPC as an abuse of the process of law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 145 - Initiation of Proceedings - Pending Civil Suit - The court considered whether proceedings under Section 145 CrPC can be initiated when a civil suit regarding title and possession of the same property is pending. The court held that when a civil suit is pending, the Executive Magistrate should not initiate proceedings under Section 145 CrPC as the dispute is essentially civil in nature and the civil court is competent to decide the rights of the parties. (Paras 2-3)

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 145 - Police Report - Requirement of Imminent Breach of Peace - The court examined the requirement that a police report under Section 145 CrPC must indicate an imminent breach of peace. The court held that the police report must show that there is a likelihood of breach of peace, and the Executive Magistrate must apply his mind to the report before initiating proceedings. In the present case, the police report did not indicate any imminent breach of peace, and the Magistrate mechanically initiated proceedings. (Paras 2-3)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 145 - Quashing of Proceedings - Abuse of Process - The court held that initiation of proceedings under Section 145 CrPC when a civil suit is pending amounts to an abuse of the process of law. The court quashed the proceedings to prevent multiplicity of litigation and harassment of the petitioner. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether initiation of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the petitioner based on police report is sustainable when a civil suit regarding the same property is pending.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 initiated against the petitioner based on the police report dated 31.10.2013.

Law Points

  • Section 145 CrPC proceedings cannot be initiated when civil suit regarding title and possession is pending
  • Police report under Section 145 CrPC must show imminent breach of peace
  • Executive Magistrate must apply mind before initiating proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (08) 11

Criminal Writ Petition No. 251 of 2014

2014-08-05

S.S. Shinde, P.R. Bora

Mr. S.V. Warad (for petitioner), Mr. S.G. Nandedkar (APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2), Mr. A.B. Kadethankar (for respondent no.3)

Shaikh Wajid S/o Abdul Gani

The State of Maharashtra, The Taluka Executive Magistrate, Shivkant S/o Nagappa Lasune

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash and set aside the initiation of criminal proceedings under Section 145 CrPC against him by the Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmedpur, based on police report dated 31.10.2013.

Filing Reason

The petitioner filed the petition because proceedings under Section 145 CrPC were initiated against him despite a civil suit regarding the same property being pending, and the police report did not indicate any imminent breach of peace.

Previous Decisions

Regular Civil Suit No. 03/2010 was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur, filed by Gundappa Vishwanath Nijwante challenging the sale deed and seeking declaration of ownership and injunction.

Issues

Whether initiation of proceedings under Section 145 CrPC is sustainable when a civil suit regarding the same property is pending. Whether the police report under Section 145 CrPC must indicate an imminent breach of peace.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the civil suit regarding the same property was pending, and therefore, proceedings under Section 145 CrPC were unwarranted. Petitioner argued that the police report did not indicate any imminent breach of peace, and the Magistrate mechanically initiated proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

When a civil suit regarding title and possession of the same property is pending, the Executive Magistrate should not initiate proceedings under Section 145 CrPC as the dispute is essentially civil in nature. The police report under Section 145 CrPC must indicate an imminent breach of peace, and the Magistrate must apply his mind before initiating proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

On 28.07.2013, the complainant has filed the complaint against the petitioner and his family members and on the basis of the said complaint, the authorities have taken action under section 107 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Hence, the petitioner filed present Criminal Writ Petition praying to quash and set aside initiation of the Criminal Proceedings under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the petitioner by the Taluka Executive Magistrate, Ahmedpur, Dist. Latur based on the police report bearing Outward No. 1834/2013 dated 31.10.2013 submitted from the Police Station, Ahmedpur.

Procedural History

On 29.04.2010, property purchased jointly by petitioner and complainant. On 24.05.2010, civil suit filed by third party challenging sale deed. On 20.01.2012, complainant sold his interest to petitioner. On 23.08.2012, Municipal Council issued NOC. On 28.07.2013, complainant filed complaint leading to action under Section 107 CrPC. On 31.10.2013, police report recommending action under Section 145 CrPC. Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 251 of 2014 seeking quashing of proceedings. Judgment pronounced on 05.08.2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 107, 145
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, only the plaint averments must be examined for cause of action, not their truthfu...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Section 145 CrPC Proceedings Against Petitioner in Property Dispute — Civil Suit Pending Over Same Property Renders Criminal Proceedings Unwarranted. Initiation of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Proc...