Supreme Court Dismisses Interlocutory Applications and Permits Withdrawal of Application to Deposit Amount. The Court allowed the withdrawal of the application to deposit the amount, emphasizing that the correctness of allegations made in affidavits need not be examined at this stage.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved two partition suits filed in 1975 and 1989, culminating in a consent decree in April 1993. The applicant-respondent, V.M. Singh, was a beneficiary of a family settlement and acted on behalf of the appellants. Appeals against earlier judgments were dismissed by the High Court, and special leave applications to the Supreme Court were also dismissed, with specific directions regarding the execution of a General Power of Attorney and payment of amounts due. Allegations arose that these directions were not followed, leading to a contempt petition that was dismissed. V.M. Singh sought permission to deposit the amount in question, which was granted, but he later expressed a desire to withdraw this application. The appellants opposed this withdrawal, citing serious allegations made in an affidavit against them. The Court considered the request for withdrawal and determined that it should be permitted, stating that the correctness of the allegations did not need to be addressed at this stage. The Court also dismissed the application for impleadment as it became infructuous and directed that the deposited amount be returned to Singh. The Court urged the executive court to expedite the execution proceedings. Ultimately, the Court allowed the withdrawal of the application and dismissed other interlocutory applications as infructuous.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interlocutory Applications - Withdrawal of Application - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The applicant sought to withdraw his application to deposit an amount as directed by the Court. The Court held that there was no reason to deny the withdrawal and permitted it, emphasizing that the correctness of allegations made in affidavits need not be examined at this stage (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw his application to deposit the amount as directed by the Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court permitted the applicant to withdraw his application to deposit the amount, dismissed the application for impleadment as infructuous, and directed that the deposited amount be returned to V.M. Singh.

Law Points

  • Interlocutory applications
  • withdrawal of application
  • contempt of court
  • family settlement
  • partition suits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2007 LawText (SC) (10) 211

Civil Appeal No. 6327 of 2005

2007-08-30

S.B. Sinha, Harjit Singh Bedi

Kamini Jaiswal, Bhaskar P. Gupta

Kirpal Kaur & Anr

V.M. Singh & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal concerning partition suits and family settlement.

Remedy Sought

V.M. Singh sought permission to withdraw his application to deposit an amount.

Filing Reason

Allegations of non-compliance with court directions regarding a family settlement.

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed appeals against earlier judgments; Supreme Court dismissed special leave applications.

Issues

Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw his application to deposit the amount as directed by the Court.

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant expressed intention to withdraw the application; the appellants opposed the withdrawal citing serious allegations.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court emphasized that in interlocutory matters, the correctness of allegations made in affidavits need not be examined at the stage of withdrawal of applications.

Judgment Excerpts

The applicant has expressed his intention to withdraw the said application. In a proceeding of this nature, this Court need not go into the correctness or otherwise of the allegations made by the applicant.

Procedural History

Two partition suits were filed in 1975 and 1989, leading to a consent decree in 1993. Appeals against the decree were dismissed by the High Court, and special leave applications were dismissed by the Supreme Court. Subsequent applications for deposit and impleadment were filed.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Discharge from Bank Service — Misconduct Established.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Claim for Refund in Real Estate Dispute — Jurisdiction of Commission Affirmed.