Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Father Convicted for Causing Death of Son by Burning. Dying declaration of deceased son held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 29
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sukhdeo s/o Tikaram Bhardwaj, was convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code for causing the death of his son Vishal by setting him on fire. The appellant was originally charged under Section 302 IPC for murder. The prosecution case was that the appellant had a live-in relationship with Revati, who was treated as his second wife, and had two children from her, including the deceased Vishal. There was a dispute between Revati and the appellant, leading Revati to stay with her parents, while Vishal and his brother Chhotu stayed with the appellant. On 22-1-2010 at about 3:00 to 4:00 a.m., the appellant's brother saw smoke emanating from the appellant's house and found Vishal burning and shouting. The fire was extinguished, and Vishal was admitted to the hospital. Vishal gave a dying declaration on 22-1-2010 at about 12:10 a.m. to the Executive Magistrate, stating that his father had poured kerosene on him from a kerosene lamp and set him on fire. Vishal died on 23-1-2010 due to 70.5% burn injuries. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC. The appellant appealed against the conviction. The High Court examined the evidence, including the dying declaration, and found it to be voluntary and reliable. The court noted that the appellant had not taken any specific defence. The court upheld the conviction, finding no reason to interfere with the trial court's judgment. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder - Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Dying declaration - The appellant was convicted for causing death of his son by setting him on fire - The court upheld the conviction based on the dying declaration of the deceased recorded by the Executive Magistrate, which was found to be voluntary and reliable - Held that the dying declaration is sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code is sustainable based on the dying declaration and other evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction of the appellant under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs.1,000/- is upheld.

Law Points

  • Culpable Homicide not amounting to murder
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Dying declaration
  • Appreciation of evidence
  • Sentence reduction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (07) 148

Criminal Appeal No.186 of 2012

2014-07-16

M.L. Tahaliyani

Shri N.A. Badar for the appellant, Shri A.K. Bangadkar, Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent

Sukhdeo s/o Tikaram Bhardwaj

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by trial court for causing death of his son by burning.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 304 Part II IPC and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased is reliable and sufficient to sustain conviction. Whether the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC is correct.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not reliable. Prosecution argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and consistent with medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The dying declaration of the deceased, recorded by the Executive Magistrate, is voluntary, reliable, and sufficient to sustain the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 304 PartII of the Indian Penal Code and is sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month. Deceased Vishal had stated in his statement that he was set on fire by his father after pouring kerosene on him from a kerosene lamp.

Procedural History

The appellant was chargesheeted under Section 302 IPC. Trial court convicted him under Section 304 Part II IPC. Appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.186 of 2012 in the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304 Part II, 307
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Father Convicted for Causing Death of Son by Burning. Dying declaration of deceased son held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Assistant Professors at UM-DAE Centre for Excellence in Basic Sciences — Violation of Natural Justice and Contractual Terms. Termination orders set aside as they were passed without...