Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a hired jeep; insurer not liable for own damage but liable for third-party claim under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 67
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by The New India Assurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, in MACP No.256 of 2010. The Tribunal had allowed the claim petition filed by the respondents (claimants) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and awarded compensation of Rs.7.5 lakh with interest at 7.5% per annum, holding the Insurance Company jointly and severally liable with the owner of the vehicle. The claim arose from the death of Shrimant Misal, who was a passenger in a Toyota Qualis jeep bearing registration No.MH-15-A-9349, hired by him and his colleagues. The jeep collided with an unknown vehicle near Pulgaon at around 10-11 p.m., resulting in Shrimant's death. The claimants alleged negligence on the part of both drivers. The Insurance Company contended that the deceased was a gratuitous passenger and that the insurer was not liable for own damage claims. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of both drivers, attributing 50% contributory negligence to the driver of the jeep. The Court held that the Insurance Company is liable only to the extent of the negligence of its insured vehicle's driver. Consequently, the compensation was reduced to Rs.3.75 lakh (50% of Rs.7.5 lakh) with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition until realization. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Compensation - Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a hired jeep which collided with an unknown vehicle - Both drivers were negligent - Held that contributory negligence of the deceased's driver must be considered, and compensation apportioned accordingly (Paras 5-10).

B) Motor Accident Claims - Liability of Insurer - Gratuitous Passenger - The deceased was not a third party but a passenger in the insured vehicle - Under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer is not liable for own damage claims of gratuitous passengers unless a separate policy is taken - However, since the accident involved another vehicle, the insurer of the jeep is liable to the extent of the negligence of its driver (Paras 6-12).

C) Motor Accident Claims - Quantum of Compensation - Reduction of Award - The Tribunal awarded Rs.7.5 lakh with interest at 7.5% per annum - The High Court reduced the compensation to Rs.3.75 lakh with interest at 7.5% per annum, considering 50% contributory negligence (Paras 11-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger in a hired vehicle, and whether contributory negligence can be attributed to the deceased.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is partly allowed. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced from Rs.7.5 lakh to Rs.3.75 lakh with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of the petition until realization. The Insurance Company is liable to pay the reduced amount.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Gratuitous passenger
  • Liability of insurer
  • Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Apportionment of compensation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (07) 17

First Appeal No.1638 of 2013

2014-07-07

T.V. Nalawade, J.

Shri. Ajit B. Kadethankar for appellant, Shri. R.V. Gore for respondent Nos.1 and 2, Shri. Amit K. Chitnis for respondent No.4

The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Lilabai Shrimant Misal, Prathmesh Shrimant Misal (minor), Antikabai Kundlik Misal, Sarvar Ali Ahmed Ali

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

The appellant Insurance Company sought to set aside or reduce the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Filing Reason

The Insurance Company challenged the Tribunal's award holding it jointly and severally liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, allowed the claim petition and awarded Rs.7.5 lakh with interest at 7.5% per annum.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation for the death of a gratuitous passenger in a hired vehicle? Whether contributory negligence can be attributed to the deceased and how it affects the compensation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The deceased was a gratuitous passenger; the insurer is not liable for own damage claims; the accident was due to the negligence of the unknown vehicle driver. Respondents (Claimants): The accident occurred due to the negligence of both drivers; the Insurance Company is jointly and severally liable.

Ratio Decidendi

In a motor accident claim, if the deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a hired vehicle, the insurer is not liable for own damage claims but is liable to the extent of the negligence of its insured vehicle's driver. Contributory negligence of the deceased's driver must be considered, and compensation apportioned accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

The petition was filed in respect of death of Shrimant Misal, who was husband of respondent No.1. It is the case of the claimants that the deceased and his two colleagues had taken a Toyoto Qualis jeep bearing No.MH-15-A-9349 on hire basis from the owner and they were proceeding to Jalna. The claim was made only against the owner and the Insurance Company of Jeep No.MH-15-A-9349.

Procedural History

The claim petition (MACP No.256 of 2010) was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalna, which awarded compensation. The Insurance Company appealed to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, which partly allowed the appeal on 7th July 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Deceased was a gratuitous passenger in a hired jeep; insurer not liable for own damage but liable for third-party cla...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Industrial Dispute Case — Violation of Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act Proved Despite Employee's Failure to Produce Documentary Evidence. Adverse Inference Drawn Against Employe...