High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Held Liable for Death of Goods Owner. The court held that the deceased being the owner of goods travelling in a goods vehicle is covered under the insurance policy and the insurer is liable to indemnify the owner.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the owner of a minidoor vehicle against the judgment and award of the Claims Tribunal, Beed, which had exonerated the Insurance Company from liability. The accident occurred on 5.2.2007 when the vehicle turned turtle due to rash and negligent driving, resulting in the death of Suresh, who was travelling with his goods (gunny bags and wooden stumps) as owner of goods. The claimants, being the widow and minor children of the deceased, sought compensation. The owner contended that the vehicle was insured with the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and that the deceased was travelling as owner of goods, thus the insurer was liable to indemnify. The Insurance Company argued that the deceased was a fare-paying passenger and that the driver lacked a valid driving licence. The Tribunal exonerated the Insurance Company, leading to the present appeal by the owner. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the deceased being the owner of goods travelling in the goods vehicle is covered under the insurance policy as per Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court found that the Tribunal erred in exonerating the Insurance Company and directed the insurer to pay the compensation amount to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner if there was any breach of policy conditions. The court allowed the appeal and set aside the Tribunal's order exonerating the Insurance Company.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Liability of Insurance Company - Owner of Goods - Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The court considered whether the Insurance Company is liable to indemnify the owner when the deceased was travelling as owner of goods in a goods vehicle. The Tribunal had exonerated the Insurance Company, but the High Court reversed, holding that the deceased being the owner of goods is covered under the policy and the insurer is liable to pay compensation. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to indemnify the owner of the vehicle when the deceased was travelling as owner of goods in a goods vehicle at the time of accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order exonerating the Insurance Company, and held that the Insurance Company is liable to pay the compensation amount to the claimants. The court directed the insurer to pay the compensation and then recover the same from the owner if there was any breach of policy conditions.

Law Points

  • Motor Accident Claims
  • Liability of Insurance Company
  • Owner of Goods
  • Goods Vehicle
  • Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Indemnification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (07) 12

First Appeal No. 481 of 2010

2014-07-24

T. V. Nalawade, J.

Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar for appellant, Mr. K.B. Bade Patil with Mr. B.A. Dhengle for respondent No.1, Mr. Girish Rane for respondent Nos.2 to 7

Nanasaheb s/o Trimbakrao Jarange

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Claims Tribunal exonerating Insurance Company from liability in a motor accident claim.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (owner of the vehicle) sought to set aside the Tribunal's order exonerating the Insurance Company and to hold the insurer liable to indemnify the owner.

Filing Reason

The Tribunal exonerated the Insurance Company from liability, which the owner challenged.

Previous Decisions

The Claims Tribunal, Beed, in Claim Petition No. 47 of 2007, exonerated the Insurance Company from liability.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to indemnify the owner when the deceased was travelling as owner of goods in a goods vehicle.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (owner) argued that the vehicle was insured and the deceased was travelling as owner of goods, so the Insurance Company is liable. Insurance Company argued that the deceased was a fare-paying passenger and the driver lacked a valid driving licence, thus no liability.

Ratio Decidendi

The deceased being the owner of goods travelling in a goods vehicle is covered under the insurance policy as per Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the Insurance Company is liable to indemnify the owner.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is filed against the judgment and award of claim petition No. 47 of 2007, which was pending before the Claims Tribunal, Beed. The Tribunal has exonerated the Insurance Company and only on that point the decision is challenged by the original respondent No.1, owner.

Procedural History

The claim petition was filed before the Claims Tribunal, Beed, which exonerated the Insurance Company. The owner appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Preliminary Issue on Limitation in Civil Suit — Limitation Issue Held to be Mixed Question of Law and Fact Not Triable Under Section 9A CPC
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Held Liable for Death of Goods Owner. The court held that the deceased being the owner of goods travelling in a goods vehicle is covered under the ...