Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Rider Without Valid Driving Licence. Insurer Not Liable to Pay Compensation as Breach of Policy Condition Established Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 49
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal filed by Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambajogai, District Beed, in MACP No.95 of 2008. The Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs.1,42,500/- to the claimant, respondent No.1, and held the owner and the Insurance Company jointly and severally liable to pay the amount. The accident involved a motorcycle, and the claimant was injured. The Insurance Company's defence was that the rider of the motorcycle did not hold a valid and effective driving licence at the time of the accident, and therefore, the Insurance Company should not be held liable. The Tribunal framed an issue on this point, and both sides led evidence. The Insurance Company examined its officer, who produced the charge-sheet filed against the rider for driving without a valid licence under Section 3 read with Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The officer also testified that a notice was sent by registered post to the owner's address available on record, asking him to supply information about the driving licence, but no response was received. The Court, after considering the evidence, found that the rider was indeed driving without a valid driving licence, which constituted a breach of the policy conditions. Relying on Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Court held that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation in such a case. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the award against the Insurance Company, and directed that the owner of the vehicle shall be liable to pay the compensation amount. The Court also directed that if the Insurance Company had already paid the amount, it would be entitled to recover the same from the owner.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Insurance Company Liability - Driving Licence Validity - Section 149(2)(a)(ii) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Insurance Company appealed against the award of compensation by the Claims Tribunal, contending that the rider of the motorcycle did not hold a valid driving licence. The Court examined the evidence, including the charge-sheet and the Insurance Company's officer's testimony, and held that the rider was driving without a valid licence, constituting a breach of policy conditions. Consequently, the Insurance Company was not liable to pay compensation, and the liability was shifted to the owner of the vehicle. (Paras 4-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation when the rider of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid and effective driving licence at the time of the accident.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and award of the Claims Tribunal is set aside insofar as it holds the Insurance Company liable. The owner of the vehicle is held liable to pay the compensation amount. If the Insurance Company has already paid the amount, it is entitled to recover the same from the owner.

Law Points

  • Motor accident compensation
  • Insurance company liability
  • Driving licence validity
  • Breach of policy condition
  • Section 149(2)(a)(ii) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (06) 15

First Appeal No.2018 of 2010

2014-06-24

T.V. Nalawade, J.

Shri. Santosh G. Chapalgaonkar for appellant; Shri. R.B. Deshpande for respondent No.1

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Wahidbi W/o Pashabhai Shaikh and Ramaswami S/o Marugana Goundha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in a claim petition for compensation.

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought to avoid liability to pay compensation on the ground that the rider of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid driving licence.

Filing Reason

The Insurance Company was aggrieved by the Tribunal's award holding it jointly and severally liable to pay compensation.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambajogai, District Beed, in MACP No.95 of 2008, awarded compensation of Rs.1,42,500/- and held the owner and Insurance Company jointly and severally liable.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation when the rider of the offending vehicle did not hold a valid and effective driving licence at the time of the accident.

Submissions/Arguments

The Insurance Company argued that the rider was not holding a valid driving licence, as evidenced by the charge-sheet and the officer's testimony, and therefore the Insurance Company is not liable under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation if the vehicle was driven without a valid driving licence, as it constitutes a breach of policy conditions.

Judgment Excerpts

The rider of the motor cycle was not holding valid and effective driving licence on the date of accident and so it cannot be held liable to pay the compensation. The Insurance Company examined its officer and produced the record like copy of charge-sheet filed against the rider of the motor cycle. Case was filed against the rider of the motor cycle, the offending vehicle, for offence of driving the vehicle without valid and effective driving licence (under section 3 read with section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988).

Procedural History

The claimant filed MACP No.95 of 2008 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambajogai, District Beed. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.1,42,500/- and held the owner and Insurance Company jointly and severally liable. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.2018 of 2010 before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The appeal was admitted on 21st April 2014 and heard for final disposal on 24th June 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 3, 181, 149(2)(a)(ii)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Rider Without Valid Driving Licence. Insurer Not Liable to Pay Compensation as Breach of Policy Condition Established Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Charter Hire Agreement. Respondent Waived 60-Day Notice Requirement by Not Objecting to Invocation of Arbitration.