Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Government Employee — Applies Multiplier of 13 and Adds Future Prospects. The court held that for a permanent employee aged 50, the multiplier should be 13 as per Sarla Verma, and 30% future prospects should be added, with 1/4th deduction for personal expenses.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 45
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the claimants, being the widow, children, and father of the deceased, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, in Claim Petition No.202/2008. The deceased was a permanent labourer in the Irrigation Department of the State Government, aged about 50 years, earning Rs.8,128 per month. He died in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs.7,07,224 as compensation. The claimants contended that the Tribunal erred in applying a multiplier of 8 instead of 13 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and in not adding future prospects. The High Court agreed, holding that for a government employee aged 50, the multiplier should be 13 and future prospects of 30% should be added. The court also noted that there were 5 dependents, so deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th instead of 1/3rd. The court recalculated the loss of dependency as Rs.8,128 + 30% = Rs.10,566.40 per month, annual income Rs.1,26,796.80, deducting 1/4th for personal expenses gives Rs.95,097.60 per year, multiplied by 13 gives Rs.12,36,268.80, rounded to Rs.12,36,269. Adding Rs.1,00,000 for loss of consortium, Rs.1,00,000 for loss of love and affection, Rs.25,000 for funeral expenses, and Rs.10,000 for loss of estate, total compensation comes to Rs.14,71,269. However, the court restricted the enhancement to Rs.10,68,000 as per the claimants' own calculation in the appeal. The appeal was partly allowed, enhancing compensation to Rs.10,68,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation for Death - Multiplier Method - Future Prospects - The court considered the calculation of compensation for death of a permanent government employee aged 50 years, earning Rs.8,128 per month. The Tribunal had applied multiplier of 8 and deducted 1/3rd for personal expenses. The High Court held that as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, the appropriate multiplier for age 50 is 13, and future prospects of 30% should be added. The court also held that deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th as there were 5 dependents. Compensation enhanced from Rs.7,07,224 to Rs.10,68,000. (Paras 4-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for the death of a government employee was just and proper, and whether the claimants are entitled to enhancement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation enhanced from Rs.7,07,224 to Rs.10,68,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization. Respondent No.2 (Insurance Company) directed to pay the enhanced amount within eight weeks.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Compensation for death
  • Multiplier method
  • Future prospects
  • Deduction for personal expenses
  • Dependency calculation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (06) 14

First Appeal No.985 of 2012

2014-06-27

T.V. Nalawade, J.

Shri. Ravibhushan P. Adgaonkar for appellants, Shri. K.V. Patil for respondent No.1, Shri. A.G. Kanade for respondent No.2

Chaya w/o Dilip Tamte and others

Suresh s/o Gurusidappa Karanje and another

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal seeking enhancement of compensation for death of husband/father.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.7,07,224 to a higher amount.

Filing Reason

Claimants were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, awarded Rs.7,07,224 in Claim Petition No.202/2008.

Issues

Whether the multiplier of 8 applied by the Tribunal was correct? Whether future prospects should be added to the income of the deceased? What should be the deduction for personal expenses? Whether the compensation awarded is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Tribunal erred in applying multiplier of 8 instead of 13 as per Sarla Verma. Appellants argued that future prospects of 30% should be added as the deceased was a permanent government employee. Appellants argued that deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th as there were 5 dependents. Respondents supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

For a deceased government employee aged 50 years, the appropriate multiplier is 13 as per Sarla Verma v. DTC, and future prospects of 30% should be added to the income. Deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th when there are 5 dependents.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal has committed error in not considering the future prospects of the deceased. As per the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation, the multiplier for the age of 50 years is 13. The deduction for personal expenses should be 1/4th as there are 5 dependents.

Procedural History

Claim Petition No.202/2008 was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Latur, which awarded Rs.7,07,224. The claimants filed First Appeal No.985 of 2012 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking enhancement. The appeal was heard and disposed of on 27th June 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death of Government Employee — Applies Multiplier of 13 and Adds Future Prospects. The court held that for a permanent employee aged 50, the multiplier should be 13 as...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging License Cancellation of Private Security Agency for Violation of Section 13 of PSA Act, 2005. License Cancellation Upheld as Petitioner Failed to Exercise Due Diligence in Verifying Licenses of Securit...