Bombay High Court Admits Petition for Reduction of Share Capital of Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. The court directed publication of notice and dispensed with creditors' meeting due to absence of creditors.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a Company Scheme Petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking reduction of its share capital. The company had passed a special resolution in an Extraordinary General Meeting held on 11 February 2014 approving the reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital from Rs. 1,71,30,000/- (divided into 17,13,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each) to Rs. 1,00,000/- (consisting of 10,000 equity shares of Rs. 10 each) by paying off an aggregate sum not exceeding Rs. 91,11,050/- (Rs. 5.35 per share) as determined by the valuer proportionately to the holders of 17,03,000 equity shares. The company stated that there were no secured, unsecured or trade creditors, and therefore the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 had been dispensed with by an order dated 9 May 2014 in Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014. The court admitted the petition and fixed it for hearing on 13 June 2014. The court directed the petitioner to publish notice of the hearing in two local newspapers, 'Free Press Journal' in English and 'Navshakti' in Marathi, at least 14 days before the hearing, and dispensed with publication in the Maharashtra Government Gazette. The petitioner was also directed to file an Affidavit of Service as per Rule 30 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Reduction of Share Capital - Sections 100-104 Companies Act, 1956 - Petition admitted - The petitioner company sought reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital from Rs. 1,71,30,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000/- by paying off shareholders at Rs. 5.35 per share as per valuer's report. The court admitted the petition and directed publication of notice in newspapers, dispensing with gazette publication and creditors' meeting as there were no creditors. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition for reduction of share capital filed by Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited should be admitted and directions issued for hearing.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition was admitted and fixed for hearing on 13 June 2014. The court directed publication of notice in two newspapers, dispensed with gazette publication, and required filing of an Affidavit of Service.

Law Points

  • Reduction of share capital
  • Special resolution
  • Valuation
  • Dispensation of creditors' meeting
  • Publication of notice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (05) 54

Company Scheme Petition No. 240 of 2014 connected with Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014

2014-05-09

G. S. Patel

Ms. Saeeda Bandukwala i/b by J. Sagar Associates

Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company petition for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought court approval for reduction of its issued and paid-up equity share capital from Rs. 1,71,30,000/- to Rs. 1,00,000/- by paying off shareholders at Rs. 5.35 per share.

Filing Reason

The company had excess share capital and sought to reduce it by paying off shareholders proportionately.

Previous Decisions

An order dated 9 May 2014 in Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014 dispensed with the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 regarding creditors.

Issues

Whether the petition for reduction of share capital should be admitted and directions for hearing issued.

Submissions/Arguments

The counsel for the petitioner stated that Article 12 of the Articles of Association authorizes reduction of share capital, a special resolution was passed, and there are no creditors, so the procedure under Section 101(2) was dispensed with.

Ratio Decidendi

The court admitted the petition for reduction of share capital as the company had complied with the requirements of passing a special resolution, obtaining a valuer's report, and had no creditors, thus dispensing with the need for a creditors' meeting.

Judgment Excerpts

Petition admitted. Petition fixed for hearing on 13th day of June, 2014. The Counsel for the Petitioner states that Article 12 of the Articles of Association authorizes the Petitioner to reduce its share capital... At least 14 days before the date fixed for hearing, Petitioner to publish notice... Publication of notice in Maharashtra Government Gazette is dispensed with. The Petitioner to file in the Registry, an Affidavit of Service as per Rule 30 of the Company (Court) Rules, 1959.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Company Scheme Petition No. 240 of 2014 and Company Summons for Direction No. 388 of 2014. On 9 May 2014, the court passed an order in the summons dispensing with the procedure under Section 101(2). On the same day, the petition was admitted and directions for hearing were issued.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 1956: 100, 101, 102, 103, 104
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Admits Petition for Reduction of Share Capital of Starwood Capital India Advisors Private Limited Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. The court directed publication of notice and dispensed with creditors' meeting due to a...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 143, 147, 148, 302, 307, 506 read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to ...