Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Minority Educational Institution Seeking Recovery of Grants-in-Aid from Municipal Corporation. Denial of grants without valid reason violates Article 30(1) of the Constitution and the Grant-in-Aid Code.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 57
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Borivali Education Society (Petitioner No.1), a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, established and administered three primary schools in Mumbai: Sheth Jadhavji Jethabai Primary School (Gujarati Medium), Borivali Education Society Primary School (Gujarati Medium), and R.G. Bajoria English Medium Primary School. These schools were recognized by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and were eligible for grants-in-aid under the Grant-in-Aid Code applicable to approved private primary schools. The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking recovery of grants totaling Rs.47,21,007/- for the period from 1992-93 to 1996-97, along with interest at 18% per annum. The petitioner claimed to be a minority institution and argued that the denial of grants was arbitrary and violative of Article 30(1) of the Constitution. The respondents, MCGM and the Education Officer, contended that the grants were not payable due to certain deficiencies, but the court found that no valid reason was communicated to the petitioner. The court held that the denial of grants without justification was arbitrary and infringed the right of minority institutions to administer their affairs. The court directed the respondents to pay the principal amount of Rs.47,21,007/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition (1997) until payment. The petition was allowed in part.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Minority Educational Institutions - Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India - Right to administer and receive grants - The petitioner society, claiming to be a minority institution, sought recovery of grants-in-aid for its three primary schools from the Municipal Corporation. The court held that the denial of grants without any valid reason or justification is arbitrary and infringes the right under Article 30(1). The Corporation is bound to release grants in accordance with the Grant-in-Aid Code. (Paras 1-15)

B) Education Law - Grant-in-Aid Code - Recognition and Grants - The schools were recognized and eligible for grants under the Grant-in-Aid Code. The court found that the Corporation had no power to withhold grants for the period in question, as the schools were duly recognized and the Code mandated payment. (Paras 2-10)

C) Administrative Law - Arbitrariness - Denial of Grants - The Corporation's failure to pay grants for five years without any communication or reason was held to be arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The court directed payment of the principal amount of Rs.47,21,007/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, claiming to be a minority educational institution, are entitled to recover grants-in-aid from the Municipal Corporation for the period from 1992-93 to 1996-97, and whether the denial of such grants is arbitrary and violative of Article 30(1) of the Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed in part. The respondents are directed to pay the principal amount of Rs.47,21,007/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing of the petition (1997) until payment.

Law Points

  • Minority educational institutions are entitled to grants-in-aid under Article 30(1) of the Constitution
  • Grant-in-Aid Code
  • Bombay Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888
  • Societies Registration Act
  • 1860
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (02) 75

Writ Petition No.222 of 1997

2014-02-10

V. M. Kanade, M. S. Sonak

Mr. G.K.Vora with Mr. T.G. Vora for the Petitioners, Mr. Vinod Mahadik for the Respondents

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking recovery of grants-in-aid from the Municipal Corporation.

Remedy Sought

Recovery of grants totaling Rs.47,21,007/- with interest at 18% per annum.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of grants-in-aid for the period 1992-93 to 1996-97 by the Municipal Corporation.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to recover grants-in-aid from the Municipal Corporation for the period 1992-93 to 1996-97? Whether the denial of grants is arbitrary and violative of Article 30(1) of the Constitution?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the schools are recognized and eligible for grants under the Grant-in-Aid Code, and the denial is arbitrary. Respondents contended that grants were not payable due to certain deficiencies, but no valid reason was communicated.

Ratio Decidendi

Minority educational institutions have a right to receive grants-in-aid under Article 30(1) of the Constitution, and denial of such grants without valid reason is arbitrary and violative of Article 14. The Grant-in-Aid Code mandates payment to recognized schools.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner No.1, i.e., Borivali Education Society, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 has established and administers inter alia the following three primary schools: By the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Petitioner No.1 which claims to be a minority institution seeks to recover grants totaling to Rs.47,21,007/- together with interest alongwith rate of 18% per annum

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 1997. Judgment reserved on November 26, 2013, and pronounced on February 10, 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 30(1), Article 14
  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
  • Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Junior Engineer in Municipal Corporation Case — Disciplinary Authority Can Impose Higher Punishment After Show Cause Notice. Disagreement with Enquiry Officer's Recommendation Does Not Violate Natural Justice ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Court declines to frame substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC as findings of fact by lower appellate court were not shown ...