Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide and Extortion in Blackmail Case — Accused's Demand for Money and Car Led to Victim's Suicide. The court held that continuous threats and demands for money, coupled with nude photographs, constituted instigation to commit suicide under Section 306 IPC and extortion under Section 386 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of the appellant, Miss Rashika @ Rishigandha Shetye, for offences under Sections 306 and 386 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Panaji, for abetting the suicide of the deceased, Prakash Gadgil, and for extorting money from him. The deceased, a 56-year-old Post Master, had an illicit relationship with the appellant, who was 23 years old. The appellant took nude photographs of the deceased on 2 November 2009 and used them to blackmail him. She also collected his personal documents and demanded money. Initially, she demanded and received Rs.30,000 and Rs.5,000. Subsequently, she demanded Rs.1,50,000, which the deceased deposited into her bank account on 12 December 2009 by withdrawing from his GPF and savings accounts. Despite this, she continued to demand more money, including a car, and on 17 April 2010, she visited his office and demanded Rs.80,000. Unable to meet the demands, the deceased committed suicide on 18 April 2010. The court found that the appellant's continuous threats and demands instigated the deceased to commit suicide, satisfying the ingredients of Section 306 IPC. Additionally, the threats to defame him by revealing the relationship and photographs constituted extortion under Section 386 IPC. The court upheld the conviction and the order to pay Rs.1,50,000 to the widow of the deceased.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Abetment of Suicide - Section 306 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Blackmail and Extortion - The accused, having an illicit relationship with the deceased, took nude photographs and demanded money, leading to the deceased's suicide. The court held that the continuous demands and threats constituted instigation and abetment to suicide, as the deceased was driven to end his life due to the harassment. (Paras 2-6)

B) Criminal Law - Extortion - Section 386 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Putting in Fear of Injury - The accused threatened to defame the deceased by revealing their relationship and nude photographs, thereby putting him in fear of injury to his reputation. The court held that the demand for money and a car under such threats amounted to extortion. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant's acts of blackmail and extortion amounted to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC and extortion under Section 386 IPC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence under Sections 306 and 386 IPC are upheld. The amount of Rs.1,50,000 found in the appellant's account is to be paid to the widow of the deceased.

Law Points

  • Abetment of suicide
  • Extortion
  • Blackmail
  • Demand of property
  • Mens rea
  • Instigation
  • Suicidal tendency
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014:BHC-GOA:51

Criminal Appeal No.32 of 2012

2014-01-10

T.V. Nalawade, J.

2014:BHC-GOA:51

Shri Ryan Menezes for the Appellant, Ms. M. Pinto, Additional Public Prosecutor for the Respondent

Miss Rashika @ Rishigandha Shetye

The State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for abetment of suicide and extortion.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence under Sections 306 and 386 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge for abetting the suicide of the deceased and extorting money from him.

Previous Decisions

The Sessions Judge convicted the appellant on 04/10/2011 in Sessions Case No.41/2010.

Issues

Whether the appellant's acts of blackmail and extortion amounted to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. Whether the appellant's threats to defame the deceased constituted extortion under Section 386 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the conviction was not sustainable as there was no direct instigation to commit suicide. Respondent argued that the continuous threats and demands for money drove the deceased to commit suicide, amounting to abetment.

Ratio Decidendi

Continuous threats and demands for money, coupled with nude photographs, constitute instigation to commit suicide under Section 306 IPC. Threats to defame by revealing illicit relationship and photographs amount to extortion under Section 386 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The accused took three photographs of the deceased when he was in nude condition by using her mobile handset. Due to these threats, the deceased gave the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- by depositing this amount in account of the accused in the bank. Due to this harassment and as the deceased was not in a position to meet this demand, deceased took the decision of committing suicide.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Panaji, on 04/10/2011 in Sessions Case No.41/2010. She filed Criminal Appeal No.32 of 2012 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which was heard and dismissed on 10/01/2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 306, 386
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Abetment of Suicide and Extortion in Blackmail Case — Accused's Demand for Money and Car Led to Victim's Suicide. The court held that continuous threats and demands for money, coupled with nude photog...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court of India – Civil Appellate Jurisdiction – Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Limitation Period – Continuing Cause of Action – Error on Face of Record – Substantive Right Over Procedural Technicality – NCDRC Order Quashed and ...