Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as injuries were inflicted during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 77
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Ashok Rambhan Gaikwad, was convicted by the II Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his wife Pushpa under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.500/-. The incident occurred on 8 January 2004, when the appellant reported to the police that he had killed his wife. The police registered an offence and found the deceased lying in a pool of blood with head injuries. The appellant was arrested, and investigation revealed that the couple had a quarrel over the appellant's suspicion of his wife's fidelity. The appellant struck his wife with a wooden dumbbell and a log of wood, causing multiple injuries. The postmortem report indicated death due to haemorrhagic shock from fractured ribs. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC. On appeal, the Bombay High Court considered whether the offence amounted to murder or a lesser offence. The court noted that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. Applying Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, the court held that the offence fell under Section 304 Part I IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder). The court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC and convicted the appellant under Section 304 Part I IPC, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs.500/-. Since the appellant had already undergone over 10 years of imprisonment, the court directed his release unless required in any other case.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 IPC - Conviction set aside - Appellant convicted for murder of his wife - Evidence showed injuries inflicted during a sudden quarrel without premeditation - Court held that the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing offence to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC (Paras 10-12).

B) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide - Section 304 Part I IPC - Sentencing - Appellant sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.500/- - Court considered that the appellant had already undergone over 10 years of imprisonment and directed his release unless required in any other case (Paras 13-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murder is sustainable in law, or whether the offence falls under a lesser degree of culpable homicide.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside. Appellant convicted under Section 304 Part I IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.500/-. Since appellant has already undergone over 10 years of imprisonment, he be released forthwith unless required in any other case.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 304 Part I IPC
  • Section 304 Part II IPC
  • Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC
  • Sudden quarrel
  • Absence of premeditation
  • Culpable homicide not amounting to murder
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (01) 80

Criminal Appeal No.1527 of 2004

2014-01-09

P.V. Hardas, A.S. Gadkari

None for the Appellant, Mr. F.R. Shaikh, Addl. P.P. for the Respondent

Ashok Rambhan Gaikwad

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of conviction and sentence under Section 302 IPC

Filing Reason

Appellant convicted for murder of his wife Pushpa

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable Whether the offence falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation State argued that the conviction under Section 302 IPC was correct

Ratio Decidendi

The case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC as the incident occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, and the appellant did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. Therefore, the offence is culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The incident had occurred during a sudden quarrel without premeditation. The appellant did not take undue advantage or act in a cruel manner. The case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the II Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, on 5 November 2004 in Sessions Case No.69 of 2004 for an offence under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304, 300
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as injuries were inflicted during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing offence to culpable homici...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Anganwadi Helper's Petition for Appointment as Sevika — No Right to Regularisation Under Government Resolution. Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under GR dated 12.3.2008 as she was not a candidate sponsored by ...