Supreme Court Directs Stoppage of Stone Crushers to Combat Air Pollution. Immediate cessation of operations ordered due to health hazards caused by air pollution from stone crushers, with directions for compliance and establishment of a new crushing zone.

  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved writ petitions filed against the owners of stone crushers for allowing pollution through stone-dust and smoke, adversely affecting the health of residents in South Delhi and bordering areas of Haryana. The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to compel authorities to take action against pollution and provide medical facilities to affected individuals. The Supreme Court acknowledged the inevitable environmental changes due to industrial development but emphasized that such changes should not compromise public health. The court found that the Delhi Development Authority and other relevant bodies had failed in their statutory duties to control air pollution, resulting in Delhi being ranked as one of the most polluted cities globally. Consequently, the court ordered the immediate cessation of operations of stone crushers in specified areas, effective from August 15, 1992, and mandated that those without valid licenses or in violation of pollution control orders cease operations immediately. The court also directed the authorities to establish a new 'crushing zone' for the affected stone crushers and ensure compliance with these orders. The court kept the writ petition pending for monitoring compliance and scheduled a follow-up for August 5, 1992.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Air Pollution Control - Stoppage of Stone Crushers - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 32 - The court directed the stoppage of mechanical stone crushers operating in specified areas due to their contribution to air pollution and health hazards for residents. The authorities were found remiss in their duties to protect the environment, necessitating immediate action to ensure compliance with environmental standards (Paras 359-361).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the operation of mechanical stone crushers in certain areas should be stopped due to air pollution and health hazards.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court ordered the immediate cessation of operations of mechanical stone crushers in specified areas effective from August 15, 1992, and directed authorities to ensure compliance with environmental standards. The court also mandated the establishment of a new crushing zone for affected stone crushers and required a progress report by July 31, 1992.

Law Points

  • Environmental law
  • Air pollution control
  • Statutory duties of authorities
  • Right to a pollution-free environment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1992 LawText (SC) (05) 1

Writ Petition (C) No.4677 of 1985

1992-05-15

Misra, RANGNATH (CJ), KANIA, M.H., KULDIP SINGH (J)

1991 SCR (1) 866, 1991 SCC (2) 353, JT 1991 (1) 620, 1991 SCALE (1) 427

M.C. Mehta, Satish Chander, Hardev Singh, P.N. Duda, B.R.L. Iyengar, P.P. Rao, V.C. Mahajan, S.S. Chadha, R. Mohan, Ms. Rekha Pandey, K.B. Rohtagi, S.K. Dhingra, Shashank Shekhar, Vishnu Mathur, Vijay Pandita, Randhir Jain, N.S. Bisht, Ms. Seema Midha, K.R.R. Pillai, R.S. Suri, R.B. Misra, C.V. Subba Rao, Kailash Vasdev, V.B. Saharya, Ranjit Kumar, R. Sridharan, Ms. Indu Malhotra, P.K. Jain, I.S. Goyal, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, R. Sasiprabhu, Ms. Anil Katiyar, B.Y. Kulkarni

M.C. Mehta

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging pollution caused by stone crushers.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus to stop pollution and provide medical facilities.

Filing Reason

Pollution from stone crushers affecting health of residents.

Previous Decisions

Writ petitions filed in Delhi High Court were transferred to the Supreme Court.

Issues

Whether the operation of stone crushers should be stopped due to air pollution. What measures should be taken to rehabilitate affected stone crushers.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for immediate cessation of operations due to health risks. Respondents contended compliance with existing regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the right to a pollution-free environment and the statutory duties of authorities to control air pollution, holding that neglecting these duties could not be tolerated.

Judgment Excerpts

Environmental changes are the inevitable consequence of industrial development in our country, but, at the same time the quality of environment cannot be permitted to be damaged by polluting the Air, Water and Land to such an extent that it becomes a health-hazard for the residents of the area. The authorities concerned in the Union Territories of Delhi have been wholly re-miss in the performance of their statutory duties and have failed to protect the environment and control air-pollution in the Union Territory of Delhi.

Procedural History

Writ Petition (C) No.4677 of 1985 was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The case involved multiple petitions transferred from the Delhi High Court. Judgment reserved on April 24, 1992, after extensive hearings.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 32
  • Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act: Section 31A
  • Environment (Protection) Act: Section 5
  • Delhi Municipal Corporation Act:
  • Faridabad Complex Administration (Regulations and Development) Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tribal Land Transfer Case — Transfer by Tribal to Non-Tribal Without Collector Permission is Void Under MRLS Tribes Act, 1974. Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Protectio...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Despite Delay, Directs Reckoning from Husband's Death Date. Arrears Limited to Three Years Prior to Application as Delay Not Explained.