National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Appeal Execution in Consumer Dispute — Appellant Granted Liberty to Pursue Other Remedies Under Law. The Commission dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellant sought permission to withdraw with liberty to pursue other available remedies.

Tribunals: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
  • 27
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case pertains to an appeal execution (AE No.80 of 2024) filed before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The appellant, through learned counsel Mr. Deeptanshu Jain (via VC), sought permission to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other available remedies under law. The respondent, represented by Mr. N.P. Sharma (via VC), was heard. After initial arguments, the Commission allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, granting the appellant liberty to pursue other remedies under law. The order was passed by a bench comprising Dr. Inder Jit Singh (Presiding Member) and Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain (Member).

Headnote

A) Consumer Law - Execution of Order - Withdrawal of Appeal - The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other remedies under law - The Commission allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn - Held that the appellant is at liberty to pursue other available remedies under law (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other available remedies under law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal execution (AE No.80 of 2024) is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the appellant to pursue other available remedies under law.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • liberty to pursue other remedies
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (NCDRC) (01) 31

AE No.80 of 2024

2025-09-12

Dr. Inder Jit Singh, Dr. Sudhir Kumar Jain

Mr. Deeptanshu Jain, Ms. Shruti, Mr. N.P. Sharma

Ajay Gauba & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal execution in a consumer dispute

Remedy Sought

Permission to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other available remedies under law

Issues

Whether the appellant should be permitted to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other remedies under law.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other available remedies under law.

Ratio Decidendi

A party may be permitted to withdraw an appeal execution with liberty to pursue other remedies under law, and the court may dismiss the appeal as withdrawn accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

After initial arguments, learned Counsel for the Appellant on instructions sought permission to withdraw the Appeal Execution with liberty to pursue his other available remedies under law. Accordingly, AE No.80 of 2024 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal execution (AE No.80 of 2024) before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. After initial arguments, the appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal execution with liberty to pursue other remedies. The Commission dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on 12.09.2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Second Appeal and Remits Case to State Commission for Non-Prosecution Dismissal — Petitioner Granted Conditional Restoration Subject to Deposit of Rs. 5,000/- in Legal Aid Account. The appeal w...
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Withdrawal of Appeal Execution in Consumer Dispute — Appellant Granted Liberty to Pursue Other Remedies Under Law. The Commission dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after the appellant sought pe...