Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 408 IPC Based on Admission and Audit Report. Petitioner's Admission of Misappropriation of Society Funds and Audit Report Showing Shortage Sufficient to Sustain Conviction.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Yashwant Bapu Parit, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) in Regular Criminal Case No. 490 of 1984 for offences punishable under Sections 408, 467, 471, 477-A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He appealed to the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, who partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction under Sections 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC but upholding the conviction under Section 408 IPC. The petitioner then filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court challenging the conviction under Section 408 IPC. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was the secretary of the Kumbhi Kasari Sakhar Karkhana Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Mandal Ltd., a cooperative society. He was entrusted with funds of the society and allegedly misappropriated Rs. 1,500. The prosecution relied on an audit report showing a shortage of Rs. 1,500 and an admission by the petitioner that he had misappropriated the amount. The trial court convicted him on all charges, but the appellate court found that the evidence for forgery and falsification of accounts was insufficient, while the admission and audit report supported the charge of criminal breach of trust. The High Court, after hearing the parties, held that the conviction under Section 408 IPC was sustainable as the petitioner's admission and the audit report clearly established entrustment and misappropriation. The court found no merit in the revision application and dismissed it, confirming the sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 500, with default simple imprisonment for three months.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Criminal Breach of Trust - Section 408 IPC - Conviction based on admission and audit report - Petitioner, a secretary of a society, admitted misappropriation of Rs. 1,500 and audit report showed shortage of Rs. 1,500 - Held that conviction under Section 408 IPC was justified as the admission and audit report constituted sufficient evidence of entrustment and misappropriation (Paras 3-5).

B) Criminal Law - Forgery and Falsification of Accounts - Sections 467, 471, 477-A, 201 IPC - Acquittal upheld - No evidence to prove that the petitioner forged documents or falsified accounts - Held that the appellate court correctly set aside conviction for these offences as the prosecution failed to establish the ingredients (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the petitioner under Section 408 IPC was sustainable in law and whether the acquittal under Sections 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC was proper.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the criminal revision application and confirmed the conviction under Section 408 IPC with sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 500, in default simple imprisonment for three months.

Law Points

  • Criminal breach of trust
  • Section 408 IPC
  • conviction based on admission and audit report
  • acquittal for forgery and falsification of accounts due to lack of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-AS:22328

Criminal Revision Application No. 50 of 1997

2006-11-24

V.M. Kanade, J.

2006:BHC-AS:22328

Shri Nitin Pradhan with Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for the petitioner, Shri Anant Vadgaonkar for respondent No.2, Shri U.V. Nikam APP for the State

Yashwant Bapu Parit

The State of Maharashtra and Kumbhi Kasari Sakhar Karkhana Vividh Karyakari Sahakari Mandal Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision application against conviction under Section 408 IPC and acquittal under other sections.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of conviction under Section 408 IPC.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was convicted by JMFC and partly convicted by Additional Sessions Judge for criminal breach of trust.

Previous Decisions

JMFC convicted under Sections 408, 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC; Additional Sessions Judge set aside conviction under Sections 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC but upheld under Section 408 IPC.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 408 IPC was sustainable based on admission and audit report. Whether the acquittal under Sections 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC was proper.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the conviction under Section 408 IPC was not sustainable as there was no evidence of entrustment or misappropriation. Respondent argued that the admission of the petitioner and the audit report clearly established the offence.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Section 408 IPC can be sustained on the basis of an admission by the accused and an audit report showing shortage of funds, as these constitute sufficient evidence of entrustment and misappropriation.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner has been convicted by JMFC in Regular Criminal Case No.490 of 1984 for the offences punishable U/s.408, 467, 471, 477-A and 201 of the IPC. Additional Sessions Judge partly allowed the appeal and conviction recorded against the accused by the Chief Judicial Magistrate U/s.467, 471, 477-A and 201 of IPC were set aside. However, he was convicted for the offence punishable U/s.408 of IPC.

Procedural History

The petitioner was convicted by JMFC in Regular Criminal Case No. 490 of 1984. He appealed to the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, who partly allowed the appeal, setting aside conviction under Sections 467, 471, 477-A and 201 IPC but upholding conviction under Section 408 IPC. The petitioner then filed Criminal Revision Application No. 50 of 1997 before the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 408, 467, 471, 477-A, 201
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 408 IPC Based on Admission and Audit Report. Petitioner's Admission of Misappropriation of Society Funds and Audit Report Showing Shortage Sufficient to Sustain Convictio...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Insurance Claim in Fire Damage Case — Surveyor Reports Cannot Be Ignored Without Valid Reasons. Appointment of Multiple Surveyors Without Justification Leads to Adoption of First Surveyor's Report Under Section 64UM of Insuranc...