Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Society's Transfer of Membership Based on Voluntary Relinquishment of Rights. Petitioner's claim of adoption and nomination defeated by her own affidavits and agreements admitting respondent as lawful heir.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 76
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute pertains to a plot of land and flats in a cooperative housing society registered under the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925. The original member, Shri Anup Singh Grover, was allotted Plot No.119 and later constructed a first floor (Block 119A). He submitted nomination forms: the first two in favour of the second respondent (alleged wife), and the third in 1996 in favour of the petitioner (alleged adopted daughter). After his death in January 1997, disputes arose. The petitioner submitted documents to the society, including an affidavit dated 9 May 1997 admitting that the second respondent was the lawfully wedded wife and that the petitioner was not the adopted daughter or legal heir. She also executed a declaration-cum-deed of indemnity and an agreement to the same effect, agreeing that the second respondent was entitled to succeed. Based on these, the society transferred the membership to the second respondent. The petitioner later challenged this transfer, claiming she was the nominee and adopted daughter. The court held that the petitioner cannot approbate and reprobate; having voluntarily executed documents relinquishing her claim, she is estopped from challenging the transfer. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Nomination - Transfer of Membership - Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 - Sections 22, 24 - The petitioner claimed to be the adopted daughter and nominee of the deceased member, but had executed affidavits and agreements admitting the respondent as the lawful wedded wife and legal heir, and agreeing to transfer of membership in her favour. The court held that the petitioner cannot approbate and reprobate; having voluntarily relinquished her claim, she is estopped from challenging the transfer. (Paras 1-4)

B) Estoppel - Conduct - Approbate and Reprobate - The petitioner's own documents, including an affidavit and agreement, clearly stated that she was not the adopted daughter or legal heir. The court held that she cannot be allowed to resile from those admissions and claim rights contrary to them. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to challenge the transfer of membership of a cooperative society in her favour after she voluntarily executed documents relinquishing her claim and admitting the respondent as the lawful heir.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Nomination under cooperative society
  • Transfer of membership
  • Estoppel by conduct
  • Adoption
  • Legal heirship
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 73

WRIT PETITION NO.2597 OF 2004

2006-10-07

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

Mr. Rajiv Wagh with Ms. Nivit Srivastava for the Petitioner, Mr. U. P. Bobade with Mr. K. P. Ravi for Respondent No.1, Mr. G. Pandit for Respondent No.6

Chitra Haldipur

Shahid Bhagat Singh CHS Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the transfer of membership of a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the transfer of membership in favour of the second respondent and claim rights as nominee and adopted daughter.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed to be the adopted daughter and nominee of the deceased member, but the society transferred membership to the second respondent based on documents executed by the petitioner.

Issues

Whether the petitioner can challenge the transfer of membership after voluntarily executing documents relinquishing her claim. Whether the petitioner is estopped from claiming rights contrary to her own admissions.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that she was the adopted daughter and nominee of the deceased member. Respondents relied on the documents executed by the petitioner admitting the second respondent as lawful heir and agreeing to transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

A person who voluntarily executes documents admitting another's right and relinquishing her own claim cannot later approbate and reprobate by challenging the transfer based on that admission. Such conduct estops her from asserting contrary rights.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner cannot be allowed to approbate and reprobate. Having voluntarily executed the documents, she cannot now be heard to say that the transfer of membership in favour of the second respondent was illegal. The documents clearly show that the petitioner admitted that the second respondent was the lawfully wedded wife and legal heir, and that she herself was not the adopted daughter.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay challenging the transfer of membership by the society. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 7 October 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, 1925:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Society's Transfer of Membership Based on Voluntary Relinquishment of Rights. Petitioner's claim of adoption and nomination defeated by her own affidavits and agreements admitting respondent as lawful ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Condonation of Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in Central Excise Appeal. Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Provides an Outer Limit of 30 Days for Condonation, Which Cannot Be Extended by Section 5 of Lim...