Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Termination of President of Maharashtra Nursing Council. Court holds that the State Government's order terminating the petitioner's tenure as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council was arbitrary and in violation of the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 83
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Reshma Rafiq Desai, was appointed as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council, a statutory body under the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966, for a term of five years. She was a government servant holding the post of President. The State Government issued an order terminating her tenure as President without assigning any reasons and without giving her an opportunity of being heard. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The main legal issue was whether the State Government had the power to terminate the President of the Council prematurely under the Act and whether principles of natural justice were required to be followed. The petitioner argued that her appointment was for a fixed term under Section 4 of the Act and could only be terminated in accordance with the provisions of the Act and rules, which did not provide for such termination by the Government. The respondents contended that the petitioner held the office at the pleasure of the Government and could be removed without cause. The Court analyzed Section 4 of the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966, which provides for the appointment of the President by the Government and the term of office. The Court noted that the Act does not expressly confer power on the Government to terminate the President before the expiry of the term. The Court held that in the absence of such power, the termination was ultra vires the Act. Additionally, the Court held that even if the Government had the power, principles of natural justice required that the petitioner be given a hearing before being removed from office. The Court allowed the petition, quashed the termination order, and directed that the petitioner be reinstated as President of the Council for the remainder of her term.

Headnote

A) Statutory Interpretation - Termination of Office - Section 4 of Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966 - The petitioner was appointed as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council for a term of five years under Section 4 of the Act. The State Government terminated her prematurely without following the procedure prescribed under the Act or affording an opportunity of hearing. The Court held that the termination was arbitrary and violative of natural justice, as the Act does not provide for removal by the Government except in accordance with the rules. (Paras 1-10)

B) Natural Justice - Right to Hearing - Removal from Statutory Office - The Court held that even if the Act is silent on the requirement of a hearing, principles of natural justice must be read into the provision when the termination affects the rights of the office-holder. The order of termination was set aside as it was passed without any show-cause notice or opportunity. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government's order terminating the petitioner as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council was valid under the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966 and principles of natural justice.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court allowed the petition, quashed the termination order, and directed that the petitioner be reinstated as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council for the remainder of her term.

Law Points

  • Termination of statutory body office-holder must be in accordance with the Act and Rules
  • Natural justice principles apply to removal from statutory office
  • Section 4 of Maharashtra Nurses Act
  • 1966 governs appointment and term of President
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (10) 65

Writ Petition (L) No. 1242 of 2006

0000-00-00

F.I. Rebello, Smt. V.K. Tahilramani

Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for petitioner, Ms. I. Calcuttawala, AGP for respondent No.1, Mr. D.N. Salvi & Mr. S.M. Kelkar for respondent No.2

Mrs. Reshma Rafiq Desai

The State of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Nursing Council

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination of the petitioner as President of Maharashtra Nursing Council.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of the termination order and reinstatement as President.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was terminated from the post of President without any notice or hearing, allegedly in violation of the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966 and principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the State Government has the power to terminate the President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council before the expiry of the term under the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966? Whether the termination order was violative of principles of natural justice?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that her appointment was for a fixed term under Section 4 of the Act and could only be terminated in accordance with the Act and rules, which do not provide for such termination by the Government. Respondents contended that the petitioner held office at the pleasure of the Government and could be removed without cause.

Ratio Decidendi

The State Government does not have the power to terminate the President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council before the expiry of the term under the Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966, and even if such power existed, principles of natural justice require that the office-holder be given a hearing before removal.

Judgment Excerpts

The order of termination is arbitrary and violative of natural justice. The Act does not provide for removal by the Government except in accordance with the rules.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the termination order. The Court heard the matter and delivered judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Nurses Act, 1966: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Termination of President of Maharashtra Nursing Council. Court holds that the State Government's order terminating the petitioner's tenure as President of the Maharashtra Nursing Council was arbitrary and...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution Court Order in Land Dispute. Court holds that objections under Section 47 of CPC cannot be raised after 30 years of decree and that execution court cannot go behind the decree.