Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Husband in Bride Burning Case. Dying Declaration Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence Under Section 302 IPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Dadarao Shankar Baghav, was convicted by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of his wife Varsharani under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment. He was also acquitted of the charge under Section 498-A IPC. His parents, originally accused no. 2 and 3, were acquitted of all charges. The prosecution case was that Varsharani was married to the appellant on 10 July 1999 and soon after marriage, the appellant and his parents started ill-treating her on the pretext that she was not doing work and cooking properly. On 11 October 1999 at about 9:50 p.m., Varsharani was brought to the Primary Health Center, Velapur, in a burnt condition. She was attended by Dr. Anirudha Pimple (PW-1), who informed the police and referred her to the Civil Hospital, Solapur. At the hospital, her dying declaration was recorded by the Executive Magistrate, in which she stated that her husband (the appellant) had poured kerosene on her and set her on fire. The trial court relied on this dying declaration and convicted the appellant. The High Court, in appeal, examined the evidence and found that the dying declaration was voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence and the testimony of the deceased's father. The court held that the conviction under Section 302 IPC was sustainable. However, the acquittal under Section 498-A IPC was confirmed as the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment for dowry. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Dying Declaration - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The deceased Varsharani, married to appellant, died due to burn injuries. Her dying declaration recorded by the Executive Magistrate implicated the appellant and his parents. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC but acquitted the parents. The High Court upheld the conviction, holding that the dying declaration was voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence and the testimony of the deceased's father. (Paras 1-3)

B) Criminal Law - Dowry Harassment - Section 498-A Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The appellant was acquitted of the charge under Section 498-A IPC. The prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment for dowry beyond reasonable doubt. The High Court confirmed the acquittal on this count. (Para 1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife is sustainable based on the dying declaration and other evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC with life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1000/-.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC
  • Section 498-A IPC
  • Section 34 IPC
  • Section 428 CrPC
  • dying declaration
  • medical evidence
  • circumstantial evidence
  • presumption of dowry death
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (08) 40

Criminal Appeal No.1 of 2002 in Sessions Case No.5 of 2000

2006-08-09

J.N. Patel, Smt. Roshan S. Dalvi

Mr. S.G. Deshmukh with Mr. Shrikant Yadav and Mr. Dilip Bodake for the appellant, Mrs. P.H. Kantharia, A.P.P. for the state

Shri Dadarao Shankar Baghav

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and acquittal on dowry harassment charge.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of his wife based on dying declaration.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant under Section 302 IPC and acquitted him under Section 498-A IPC; parents acquitted.

Issues

Whether the dying declaration of the deceased is reliable and sufficient to sustain the conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the dying declaration was not reliable and there was no corroboration. State argued that the dying declaration was voluntary and consistent with medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

A dying declaration, if found to be voluntary, consistent, and corroborated by medical evidence, can be the sole basis for conviction under Section 302 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant accused alongwith his father Shankar Ramchandra Bagav and mother Sou.Girijabai Shankar Bagav were tried on a charge of having committed offence under section 302, 498-A r/w s.34 of the Indian Penal Code... It is the prosecution case that the deceased Varsharani was married to the appellant accused Dadarao Shankar Bagav on 10.7.99... On the fateful day i.e.11.10.1999 at about 9.50 p.m. Sou. Varsha was brought to Primary Health Center, Velapur in burnt condition...

Procedural History

The appellant was tried along with his parents in Sessions Case No.5 of 2000 before the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC and acquitted him under Section 498-A IPC, while acquitting the parents. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No.1 of 2002 before the Bombay High Court against his conviction.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498-A, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 428
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife by Husband in Bride Burning Case. Dying Declaration Found Reliable and Corroborated by Medical Evidence Under Section 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Acquits Appellants of Rioting and Arson Charges Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Object. Conviction for House Trespass and Hurt Sustained Based on Testimony of Injured Witnesses.