Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Grace Marks for MCA Examination. Grace Marks Cannot Be Claimed as a Matter of Right; University's Discretion in Granting Grace Marks Upheld.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 30
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Ajay Prakash Ambagade, a citizen of India and permanent resident of Nagpur, joined the University of Pune for a Master of Computer Application (MCA) degree, a three-year post-graduate course consisting of six semesters. He studied from June 2000 and attended five semesters till December 2002. The sixth semester did not require college attendance or written examination. The last conventional examination was for the fifth semester. The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the University to grant him grace marks in one subject, Advanced Java Programming, and declare him as having passed the MCA examination. The Court considered whether the petitioner had a right to claim grace marks. The Court noted that grace marks are not a matter of right and the University has discretion in granting them. The Court found no arbitrariness in the University's decision and dismissed the petition. The Court held that the petitioner had no vested right to grace marks and the University's discretion was properly exercised.

Headnote

A) University Law - Grace Marks - Right to Claim - Grace marks cannot be claimed as a matter of right; the University has discretion to grant or refuse grace marks. The petitioner sought direction to grant grace marks in Advanced Java Programming to pass the MCA examination. The Court held that there is no vested right to grace marks and the University's decision not to grant them was not arbitrary. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner has a right to claim grace marks in a subject to pass the Master of Computer Application examination.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Grace marks are not a matter of right
  • University's discretion in granting grace marks
  • No vested right to grace marks
  • Interpretation of University Ordinances
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-AS:16893-DB

WRIT PETITION NO.7599 OF 2004

2006-08-29

V.G. Palshikar, Acting C.J., V.M. Kanade, J.

2006:BHC-AS:16893-DB

Ms. A. Kaushik for the Petitioner, Mr. Girish Kulkarni with Mrs. M.G. Kulkarni for Respondent Nos.1 to 3

Ajay Prakash Ambagade

University of Pune, Vice Chancellor, Controller of Examinations, Institute of Business Management & Research

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking direction to grant grace marks

Remedy Sought

Direction to the University to grant grace marks in Advanced Java Programming and declare the petitioner as having passed the MCA examination

Filing Reason

Petitioner failed in one subject and sought grace marks to pass

Issues

Whether the petitioner has a right to claim grace marks in a subject to pass the Master of Computer Application examination.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for grant of grace marks as a matter of right. Respondents opposed, stating grace marks are discretionary.

Ratio Decidendi

Grace marks are not a matter of right; the University has discretion to grant or refuse grace marks, and the Court will not interfere unless the decision is arbitrary.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the 1st respondent University requiring it to grant to the petitioner grace marks in one subject viz., Advanced Java Programming, and declare him as having passed the Master of Computer Application examination.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.7599 of 2004 before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the University to grant grace marks. The petition was heard and dismissed on 29th August 2006.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial court's refusal to grant specific performance of agreement to sell as plaintiffs failed to prove re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Grace Marks for MCA Examination. Grace Marks Cannot Be Claimed as a Matter of Right; University's Discretion in Granting Grace Marks Upheld.