Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Lessee in Lease Renewal Dispute Due to Failure to Prove Timely Notice. Option to Renew Lease Must Be Exercised Before Expiry of Original Term; Notice Given After Expiry Is Invalid Under Clause 3(c) of Lease Deed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 244
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a lease deed dated 27th August 1956 between Burmah Shell Oil Storage & Distributing Company of India Ltd. (predecessor-in-title of the petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.) and the respondents, trustees of Mbona Hospital Trust. The lease was for a term of 20 years commencing from 1st January 1956 at a monthly rent of Rs.550. Clause 3(c) of the lease deed contained a renewal covenant requiring the lessee to give not less than two calendar months' notice in writing prior to the expiration of the term expressing a desire to renew. The lessee was required to have duly observed and performed all terms and conditions. The original term expired on 31st December 1975. The petitioner claimed that a notice dated 30th October 1975 was sent by registered post expressing desire to renew, but the respondents disputed receipt. The trial court and first appellate court held that the notice was not proved to have been served. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging these findings. The High Court examined the evidence and found that the notice was not proved to have been served before the expiry of the lease. The court held that even if the notice was sent, it was not received by the respondents. The court further held that the option to renew must be exercised before the expiry of the original term; a notice given after expiry is invalid. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Lease - Renewal - Option to Renew - Clause 3(c) of Lease Deed - The lessee must give notice expressing desire to renew prior to expiration of the term; notice given after expiry is invalid and cannot be considered as exercise of option. (Paras 1-5)

B) Contract - Interpretation - Strict Construction - Renewal Covenant - A covenant for renewal must be strictly construed; the condition precedent of giving notice before expiry must be fulfilled. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the lessee's notice expressing desire to renew the lease, given after the expiry of the original term, is valid under Clause 3(c) of the lease deed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the concurrent findings of the courts below that the notice was not proved to have been served before the expiry of the lease term. The court held that the option to renew must be exercised prior to the expiration of the original term, and a notice given after expiry is invalid.

Law Points

  • Option to renew lease must be exercised before expiry of original term
  • Notice of renewal given after expiry of lease is invalid
  • Covenant for renewal must be strictly construed
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-AS:13520

WRIT PETITION NO.10795 OF 2004

2006-07-18

DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

2006:BHC-AS:13520

Mr.S.G.Page with S.R.Page for petitioners, Mr.P.S.Dani for respondents

M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Dr. Rustom Behramji Colah & Ors. (Trustees of Mbona Hospital Trust)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging concurrent findings of courts below in a suit for possession and mesne profits.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and first appellate court which dismissed the suit for specific performance of renewal covenant.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed that it had exercised the option to renew the lease by notice dated 30th October 1975, but the respondents disputed receipt and refused renewal.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the suit; first appellate court confirmed dismissal. Both courts held that the notice was not proved to have been served before expiry of lease.

Issues

Whether the notice dated 30th October 1975 was served on the respondents before the expiry of the lease term on 31st December 1975. Whether the option to renew the lease can be exercised after the expiry of the original term.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the notice was sent by registered post and must be presumed to have been served under Section 27 of the General Clauses Act. Respondents argued that the notice was not received and the petitioner failed to prove service; the option to renew must be exercised before expiry.

Ratio Decidendi

The option to renew a lease must be exercised strictly in accordance with the terms of the covenant. Where the covenant requires notice to be given prior to the expiration of the term, a notice given after expiry is invalid and cannot be considered as a valid exercise of the option.

Judgment Excerpts

Clause 3(c) of the lease deed contained the following covenant: 'If the Lessee shall have given to the Lessor not less than two calender month’s notice in writing prior to the expiration of the term preserved herein expressing a desire to renew the lease...' The option to renew must be exercised before the expiry of the original term. A notice given after expiry is invalid.

Procedural History

The respondents filed a suit for possession and mesne profits. The trial court dismissed the suit. The first appellate court confirmed the dismissal. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the concurrent findings.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Lessee in Lease Renewal Dispute Due to Failure to Prove Timely Notice. Option to Renew Lease Must Be Exercised Before Expiry of Original Term; Notice Given After Expiry Is Invalid Under Clause 3(c) of Lease Dee...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Property Dispute Case. Circumstantial evidence including motive, last seen together, and false explanation held sufficient to convict under Section...