Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Death of Minor Due to Negligence of Municipal Corporation and Contractor. Parents of Deceased Child Granted Rs. 1,50,000 with Interest Under Article 226 for Open Pit Without Safety Measures.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 129
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Prakash Warluji Dhengre and Sushila Prakash Dhengre, parents of Mahendra Dhengre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compensation for the death of their 11-year-old son. On 29.04.2005, Mahendra fell into a pit dug by respondent Nos.2 (Executive Engineer, Water Supply Department, Nagpur Municipal Corporation) and 3 (M/s. Sonu Construction) for repairs of a water pipe line, and died on the spot. The pit was open, filled with water, and lacked any safety measures such as barricades or warning signs. The petitioners contended that the negligence of respondent Nos.1 to 3 was apparent on record as the factual aspects were not controverted. The respondents did not dispute the incident but argued that the petition was not maintainable under Article 226 and that the petitioners should approach a civil court. The court, however, held that the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 could be invoked in cases of negligence resulting in death, especially where the facts are admitted or not disputed. The court found that the respondents were negligent in not providing safety measures, and awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition till realization, to be paid jointly and severally by respondent Nos.1 to 3. The court also directed that the amount be deposited within eight weeks and that the petitioners could withdraw it without furnishing security.

Headnote

A) Tort Law - Negligence - Compensation for Death - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioners sought compensation for death of their 11-year-old son who fell into an open pit dug by respondent Nos.2 and 3 for water pipe repairs, which was left uncovered and filled with water - Court held that the respondents were negligent in not providing safety measures such as barricades or warning signs, and awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization (Paras 2-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the death of their minor son due to the negligence of the Municipal Corporation and its contractor in digging a pit without proper safety measures.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and awarded compensation of Rs. 1,50,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of petition till realization, to be paid jointly and severally by respondent Nos.1 to 3 within eight weeks. The petitioners may withdraw the amount without furnishing security.

Law Points

  • Negligence
  • Strict Liability
  • Compensation
  • Article 226
  • Public Duty
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (06) 119

Writ Petition No.5711 of 1997

2006-06-19

D.D. Sinha, R.C. Chavan

Shri A.M. Ghare for Petitioners, Shri R.S. Parsodkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, Shri A.C. Dharmadhikari for Respondent No.3, Smt. Neeta Jog for Respondent No.4

Prakash S/o. Warluji Dhengre and Sushila W/o. Prakash Dhengre

The Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Executive Engineer (Water Supply Department), M/s. Sonu Construction, and The Collector, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking compensation for death of minor son due to negligence of municipal corporation and contractor.

Remedy Sought

Compensation for the death of their son due to negligence.

Filing Reason

Death of 11-year-old son Mahendra Dhengre who fell into an open pit dug by respondents for water pipe repairs and died on the spot.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to compensation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the death of their minor son due to the negligence of the respondents.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that negligence of respondent Nos.1 to 3 is apparent on record as factual aspects are not controverted; the pit was open, filled with water, and without safety measures. Respondents argued that the petition under Article 226 is not maintainable and petitioners should approach civil court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that in cases of negligence resulting in death, where facts are admitted or not disputed, the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 can be invoked to grant compensation. The respondents were negligent in not providing safety measures such as barricades or warning signs around the open pit.

Judgment Excerpts

It is contended that the petitioners have invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution for grant of compensation to the petitioners for the negligence of respondent Nos.1 to 3 due to which the petitioners lost their 11 years son. In the instant case, negligence on the part of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 is apparent on the face of record since the factual aspects are not specifically controverted by the respondent in their submissions/affidavit. We are of the view that the respondents were negligent in not providing safety measures such as barricades or warning signs around the pit.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.5711 of 1997 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for the death of their son. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on June 19, 2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Death of Minor Due to Negligence of Municipal Corporation and Contractor. Parents of Deceased Child Granted Rs. 1,50,000 with Interest Under Article 226 for Open Pit Without Safety Measures.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Review Petitions in Art & Craft Teacher Recruitment Dispute, Holds Equivalence of Qualifications is a Matter for the State to Determine. The court set aside its earlier judgment and restored the High Court's order recognizing the...