Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Professor Challenging Transfer in Medical Education Case — Transfer Quashed Due to Proximity to Superannuation and Health Grounds. Transfer of a Professor in Biochemistry less than one year before retirement set aside as arbitrary under service law principles.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Nilkanth s/o Ramji Akarte, was appointed as Lecturer in Biochemistry at Government Medical College, Nagpur on 17.3.1977 and promoted to Professor on 25.7.1994. He was due to superannuate on 31.7.2006. However, less than one year before his superannuation, he was transferred to Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal. The petitioner challenged the transfer order before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal but failed to obtain interim relief, and was relieved from Nagpur on 11.8.2005. He joined at Yavatmal on 22.8.2005. The petitioner contended that being a heart patient and having to live alone at Yavatmal, the transfer was arbitrary. The respondents argued that the transfer was in public interest and the petitioner had already joined. The court held that the transfer, being just less than one year before superannuation and given the petitioner's health condition, was arbitrary and not in consonance with the transfer policy. The court quashed the transfer order and directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue at Nagpur till his superannuation.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Arbitrariness - Transfer of employee less than one year before superannuation - The petitioner, a Professor in Biochemistry, was transferred from Nagpur to Yavatmal just less than one year before his superannuation. The court held that such a transfer, especially when the employee is a heart patient and has to live alone, is arbitrary and not in consonance with the transfer policy. (Paras 2-4)

B) Service Law - Transfer - Health Grounds - Consideration of medical condition - The petitioner's heart ailment and the need to live alone at the transferred place were considered valid grounds to set aside the transfer. The court directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue at Nagpur till his superannuation. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of a government employee, who is less than one year away from superannuation and suffering from a heart ailment, is arbitrary and liable to be quashed

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the transfer order dated 11.8.2005, and directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue at Government Medical College, Nagpur till his superannuation on 31.7.2006.

Law Points

  • Transfer order challenged on grounds of arbitrariness
  • proximity to superannuation
  • health condition
  • and violation of transfer policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (06) 110

Writ Petition No. 2640 of 2006

2006-06-28

D.D. Sinha, R.C. Chavan

Mr. V.R. Thakur for Petitioner, Mrs. T.D. Khade, AGP for Respondents

Nilkanth s/o Ramji Akarte

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department; The Director, Medical Education & Research, Maharashtra State; The Dean, Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging transfer order of a government employee

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of transfer order and permission to continue at Nagpur till superannuation

Filing Reason

Petitioner was transferred less than one year before superannuation despite being a heart patient

Previous Decisions

Petitioner challenged transfer before Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal but did not get interim relief; he joined at Yavatmal on 22.8.2005

Issues

Whether the transfer of the petitioner, who is less than one year away from superannuation and suffering from a heart ailment, is arbitrary and liable to be quashed

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that transfer just less than one year before superannuation is arbitrary and he being a heart patient had to live alone at Yavatmal Respondents argued that transfer was in public interest and petitioner had already joined

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of an employee less than one year before superannuation, especially when the employee suffers from a heart ailment and has to live alone at the transferred place, is arbitrary and not in consonance with the transfer policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner was to be superannuated on 31.7.2006, however, just less than one year before his superannuation, he was transferred from Government Medical College, Nagpur, to Shri Vasantrao Naik Government Medical College, Yavatmal. Since the petitioner had to live alone at Yavatmal and being a heart patient, the petitioner find it difficult to stay at Yavatmal. In the result, the petition is allowed. The impugned order of transfer dated 11.8.2005 is quashed and set aside.

Procedural History

Petitioner appointed on 17.3.1977, promoted on 25.7.1994, transferred on 11.8.2005, challenged before Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal without interim relief, joined at Yavatmal on 22.8.2005, filed writ petition in Bombay High Court on 28.6.2006.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Professor Challenging Transfer in Medical Education Case — Transfer Quashed Due to Proximity to Superannuation and Health Grounds. Transfer of a Professor in Biochemistry less than one year before retirement set...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Permanent Disability of 45% Upheld. Claimant's left limb compound fracture due to rash driving of bus and truck collision; compensation of Rs.93,137/- awarded by Tr...