Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Compensation Order Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Death Due to Heart Attack Not Covered by No Fault Liability. The court held that death due to a medical condition like heart attack while driving does not arise out of the use of a motor vehicle for the purpose of Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 20
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves an appeal against an order dated 7th February 1991 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, which allowed an application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for interim compensation of Rs.15,000/- on account of no fault liability. The appellants, who were the original opponents in the claim petition, challenged the order on the ground that the death of the deceased was due to a heart attack and not due to any vehicular accident. The respondents, who were the claimants, had filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Act seeking compensation for the death of the deceased. The Tribunal had directed the appellant No.2 to pay Rs.15,000/- to the respondents under Section 140. The appellants contended that even according to the respondents, the cause of death was a heart attack, which does not arise out of the use of a motor vehicle. The court, after hearing the counsel for both sides, held that the death was due to a heart attack and not due to any accident involving the vehicle. Therefore, the no fault liability under Section 140 was not attracted. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and dismissed the application under Section 140. The court clarified that the dismissal of the application under Section 140 would not affect the claim petition under Section 166, which would be decided on its own merits.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - No Fault Liability - Section 140 - Death due to heart attack while driving - The issue was whether the death of the deceased, who suffered a heart attack while driving a motor vehicle, could be considered as arising out of the use of a motor vehicle for the purpose of no fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that the death must be caused by a vehicular accident and not by a medical condition unrelated to the use of the vehicle. Since the death was due to a heart attack and not due to any accident involving the vehicle, the no fault liability under Section 140 was not attracted. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the death of the deceased due to a heart attack while driving a motor vehicle can be said to have arisen out of the use of a motor vehicle so as to attract no fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The impugned judgment and order dated 7th February 1991 is set aside. The application under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is dismissed. The dismissal of the application under Section 140 will not affect the claim petition under Section 166, which will be decided on its own merits.

Law Points

  • No fault liability under Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 requires death or permanent disablement to arise out of the use of a motor vehicle
  • Death due to heart attack while driving does not attract no fault liability unless vehicular accident is the cause
  • Interim compensation under Section 140 is not payable if the death is not caused by a motor vehicle accident
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (06) 44

First Appeal No. 440 of 1991

2006-06-23

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Mrs. Anita A. Agarwal for the Appellants, Shri S.R. Singh for the Respondent No.6

Shri Dilip Namdeo Gaikwad and Shri Namdeo Shripati Gaikwad

Shri Ramchandra Dhondu Kshirsagar, Shri Vithal Dhondu Kshirsagar, Shri Ulhas Ramchandra Kshirsagar, Shri Pravin Ramchandra Kshirsagar, Shri Nitin Ramchandra Kshirsagar, and National Insurance Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order granting interim compensation under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in a claim petition under Section 166.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought setting aside of the order dated 7th February 1991 directing payment of Rs.15,000/- as interim compensation.

Filing Reason

The appellants challenged the order on the ground that death was due to heart attack, not vehicular accident, and thus no fault liability under Section 140 was not attracted.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal allowed the application under Section 140 and directed appellant No.2 to pay Rs.15,000/- to the respondents.

Issues

Whether death due to heart attack while driving a motor vehicle can be considered as arising out of the use of a motor vehicle for the purpose of Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that even according to the respondents, the cause of death was a heart attack, which does not arise out of the use of a motor vehicle, and therefore no fault liability under Section 140 is not attracted.

Ratio Decidendi

For the purpose of no fault liability under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the death or permanent disablement must arise out of the use of a motor vehicle, meaning it must be caused by a vehicular accident. Death due to a medical condition such as a heart attack, even if it occurs while driving, does not attract no fault liability under Section 140.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants submitted that even according to the Respondents Nos.1 to 5, the cause of death of the deceased was a heart attack. Therefore, the death cannot be said to have arisen out of the use of a motor vehicle. The death was due to a heart attack and not due to any accident involving the vehicle. Therefore, the no fault liability under Section 140 of the said Act was not attracted.

Procedural History

The respondents filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. They also filed an application under Section 140 for interim compensation. The Tribunal allowed the application on 7th February 1991, directing appellant No.2 to pay Rs.15,000/-. The appellants appealed against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 140, 166
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Dismissal of Workman Void for Non-Compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer's Failure to Seek Approval for Termination After Domestic Enquiry ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Compensation Order Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Death Due to Heart Attack Not Covered by No Fault Liability. The court held that death due to a medical condition like heart attack w...