Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Tax Assessment Dispute — Rateable Value Fixed Based on Actual Rent Received by Charitable Trust. Court holds that under Section 154 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, the Rateable Value of a property must be determined based on the actual rent received, not hypothetical market rent, where the property is let out and the rent is not influenced by any special relationship.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mangaldas N. Verma Charitable Trust, is a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. It owns a godown in Mumbai which was let out to M/s. I.T.C. and M/s. Chika Limited on lease for store purposes. The godown was first let out in 1978 at a rent of Re. 1.30 per sq. ft. per month inclusive of municipal taxes, and the rent was enhanced to Re. 1.55 per sq. ft. per month by an agreement dated 3.1.1984. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay assessed the property and fixed the Rateable Value at Rs. 1,74,245/- with effect from 1.4.1986. The appellant objected to this assessment and after notice and hearing, the investigating officer confirmed the Rateable Value. The appellant then filed an appeal under Section 2(1)(ix) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 before the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay, which was dismissed by order dated 30th July, 1988. The appellant then preferred the present first civil appeal before the High Court. The main legal issue was whether the Rateable Value should be determined based on the actual rent received by the appellant or on a hypothetical market rent. The appellant argued that the actual rent received was the proper measure, while the respondents contended that the rent was low and the Rateable Value should be based on the standard rent or market rent. The court analyzed Section 154 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, which provides that the Rateable Value shall be the gross annual rent at which the building may reasonably be expected to let from year to year. The court noted that where a property is actually let out and the rent is not influenced by any special relationship, the actual rent is the best evidence of the reasonable rent. The court found that the appellant, being a charitable trust, had let out the godown to tenants at arm's length, and there was no evidence that the rent was influenced by any special relationship. The court also noted that the respondents had not discharged the burden of showing that the actual rent was not the proper measure. The court held that the Rateable Value should be fixed based on the actual rent received, and set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judge and the investigating officer. The court directed the respondents to re-determine the Rateable Value in accordance with the law, based on the actual rent received by the appellant.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Rateable Value - Determination - Section 154 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - The Rateable Value of a property let out to a tenant must be based on the actual rent received, provided the letting is not influenced by any special relationship. The court held that the appellant, a charitable trust, had let out the godown to tenants at arm's length, and the rent was not influenced by any special relationship. Therefore, the Rateable Value should be fixed at the actual rent received, not at a hypothetical higher rent. (Paras 1-10)

B) Municipal Law - Rateable Value - Burden of Proof - Section 154 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - The burden is on the municipal corporation to show that the actual rent is not the proper measure of Rateable Value. The court held that the respondents failed to discharge this burden, as there was no evidence that the rent was influenced by any special relationship or that the property was not let out in the normal course. (Paras 8-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Rateable Value of a godown owned by a charitable trust and let out to tenants should be determined on the basis of the actual rent received or on the basis of hypothetical market rent.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The order of the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay, dated 30th July, 1988, and the order of the investigating officer dated 31st March, 1986, are set aside. The respondents are directed to re-determine the Rateable Value in accordance with law, based on the actual rent received by the appellant.

Law Points

  • Rateable Value
  • Actual Rent
  • Municipal Tax Assessment
  • Section 154 Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act
  • 1888
  • Charitable Trust
  • Bombay Public Trust Act
  • 1950
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006:BHC-AS:6736

First Civil Appeal No. 284 of 1989

2006-03-31

K.J. Rohee, J.

2006:BHC-AS:6736

Mr. Rahul Chitnis for the appellant, Mr. N.V. Walawalkar for the respondents

Mangaldas N. Verma Charitable Trust by it Managing Trustee, Mrs. Sarla Verma

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay and The Municipal Commissioner for Greater Bombay

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of Municipal Appeal challenging fixation of Rateable Value of a godown owned by a charitable trust.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay, and the investigating officer, and to have the Rateable Value determined based on actual rent received.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the fixation of Rateable Value at Rs. 1,74,245/- by the investigating officer, which was upheld by the Additional Chief Judge, as arbitrary and illegal.

Previous Decisions

The investigating officer fixed Rateable Value at Rs. 1,74,245/- with effect from 1.4.1986. The Additional Chief Judge dismissed Municipal Appeal No. 186 of 1986 on 30th July, 1988.

Issues

Whether the Rateable Value of the godown should be determined on the basis of actual rent received or on hypothetical market rent. Whether the respondents discharged the burden of showing that the actual rent is not the proper measure of Rateable Value.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the actual rent received is the best evidence of the reasonable rent and should be the basis for Rateable Value. The respondents contended that the rent was low and the Rateable Value should be based on standard rent or market rent.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 154 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, the Rateable Value of a property that is actually let out and not influenced by any special relationship must be determined based on the actual rent received, as it is the best evidence of the reasonable rent. The burden is on the municipal corporation to show that the actual rent is not the proper measure, and if it fails to do so, the Rateable Value must be fixed on the actual rent.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has preferred this appeal against the dismissal of Municipal Appeal No.186 of 1986 under section 2 (1)(ix) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 by the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay by order dated 30th July, 1988. The facts which are not disputed for the purposes of the present appeal are that the appellant is a public charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 having its office at Mumbai. The appellant is the owner of a godown situated at Mumbai. It has been let out to M/s. I.T.C. And M/s. Chika Limited on lease for store purposes. The appellant objected the assessment. After giving notice as required under the provisions of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and after hearing the appellant, the investigating officer by his order dated 31.3.1986 fixed Rateable Value at Rs. 1,74,245/- with effect from 1.4.1986. The appellant preferred appeal against the order of the investigating officer challenging the fixation of Rateable Value.

Procedural History

The appellant, a charitable trust, owned a godown let out to tenants. The Municipal Corporation assessed the property and fixed Rateable Value at Rs. 1,74,245/- w.e.f. 1.4.1986. The appellant objected and after hearing, the investigating officer confirmed the assessment. The appellant filed Municipal Appeal No. 186 of 1986 under Section 2(1)(ix) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 before the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay, which was dismissed on 30th July, 1988. The appellant then filed the present First Civil Appeal No. 284 of 1989 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888: Section 154, Section 2(1)(ix)
  • Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Tax Assessment Dispute — Rateable Value Fixed Based on Actual Rent Received by Charitable Trust. Court holds that under Section 154 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, the Rateable Value of a ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Pay Revision for Unaided Private Engineering College. Government Resolutions directing retrospective implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission recommendations held not binding o...