Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Deemed Membership of Nominee. Nominee of Deceased Member Entitled to Membership Without Transfer of Shares Under Section 30 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 99
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a dispute between Maker Tower 'H' Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (petitioner) and Smt. Leena N. Parekh (respondent no.1) regarding the deemed membership of respondent no.1 as a nominee of the deceased member, respondent no.4 (Chandrakant V. Shah). The respondent no.4 was the original owner of flat no. H-21 in the petitioner society and held shares in the society. In 1994, respondent no.4 applied to add his wife, Leena M. Parekh, as an associate member. Later, in 1996, he applied to add his children and delete his wife's name, but the application was not accompanied by the share certificate. The society did not act on these applications. Respondent no.4 died, and respondent no.1 claimed to be his nominee and sought membership. The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, by order dated 22.7.1999, held that respondent no.1 was entitled to be a deemed member. This order was confirmed by the Divisional Joint Registrar on 19.6.2001. The society challenged these orders by way of a writ petition. The legal issues were whether a nominee of a deceased member is entitled to deemed membership without actual transfer of shares, and whether the society can refuse membership on the ground that the share certificate was not surrendered. The court analyzed Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, which provides that on the death of a member, the society shall transfer the shares to the nominee, and the nominee becomes a deemed member. The court held that the society's bye-laws did not require a transfer deed for nomination, and the nomination itself was sufficient. The court dismissed the petition, upholding the orders of the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar, and directed the society to admit respondent no.1 as a deemed member.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Law - Deemed Membership - Nominee Rights - Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The court considered whether a nominee of a deceased member is entitled to be deemed a member of the society without actual transfer of shares. The Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar held that the nominee is entitled to deemed membership. The court upheld these orders, reasoning that Section 30 of the Act provides that on the death of a member, the society shall transfer the shares to the nominee, and the nominee becomes a deemed member. The court held that the society cannot insist on surrender of share certificate or a separate transfer deed as a condition for recognizing the nominee's membership. (Paras 1-5)

B) Cooperative Law - Transfer of Shares - Bye-laws - Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The court examined the society's bye-laws and found that they did not require a transfer deed for nomination. The court held that the nomination itself is sufficient to confer deemed membership on the nominee, and the society's refusal to admit the nominee as a member was unjustified. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a nominee of a deceased member of a cooperative housing society is entitled to be deemed a member of the society without actual transfer of shares in his name, and whether the society can refuse membership to a nominee on the ground that the share certificate was not surrendered or that the nomination was not accompanied by a transfer deed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the petition and upheld the orders of the Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar, holding that respondent no.1 is entitled to be a deemed member of the petitioner society. The court directed the society to admit respondent no.1 as a deemed member.

Law Points

  • Deemed membership
  • Nominee rights
  • Transfer of shares
  • Section 30 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Bye-laws of society
  • Cooperative society membership
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2006 LawText (BOM) (04) 23

Chamber Summons No.60 of 2006 in Writ Petition No.2242 of 2001

2006-04-21

S.U. Kamdar

Mr. Ramesh Dhanuka i/b Ms. Anita Dhanuka for the petitioners, Mr. G.W. Mattos, A.G.P. for Show Cause Noticee, Mr. Milind More, A.G.P. for respondent nos.5 and 6, Mr. N.R. Parikh, respondent no.4 in person, Mr. Pankaj Vijayan for respondent no.3, Mr. Shyam Mehta i/b Mr. Ajay Khandhar for the applicant

Maker Tower 'H' Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. and Anr.

Smt. Leena N. Parekh and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of Deputy Registrar and Divisional Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies declaring respondent no.1 as deemed member of petitioner society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner society sought quashing of orders dated 22.7.1999 and 19.6.2001 which held that respondent no.1 is entitled to be a deemed member.

Filing Reason

Petitioner society challenged the orders on the ground that respondent no.1's application for membership was incomplete as it did not accompany the share certificate, and that the society's bye-laws required a transfer deed.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies by order dated 22.7.1999 held that respondent no.1 is entitled to be a deemed member. Divisional Joint Registrar by order dated 19.6.2001 confirmed the said order.

Issues

Whether a nominee of a deceased member of a cooperative housing society is entitled to be deemed a member without actual transfer of shares? Whether the society can refuse membership to a nominee on the ground that the share certificate was not surrendered or that the nomination was not accompanied by a transfer deed?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner society argued that the application for membership was incomplete as it did not accompany the share certificate, and that the society's bye-laws required a transfer deed for membership. Respondent no.1 argued that as a nominee of the deceased member, she is entitled to deemed membership under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and that the society cannot insist on surrender of share certificate or a separate transfer deed.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 30 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, on the death of a member, the society shall transfer the shares to the nominee, and the nominee becomes a deemed member. The society cannot insist on surrender of share certificate or a separate transfer deed as a condition for recognizing the nominee's membership. The nomination itself is sufficient to confer deemed membership.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition challenges the order dt.22.7.99 passed by the Deputy Registrar Co-op.Societies and order dt.19.6.01 passed by the Divisional Joint Registrar Co-op.Societies being Ex.'D' and 'F' to the petition. By the said order, the Deputy Registrar has held that the respondent no.1 is entitled to be a deemed member of the petitioner society.

Procedural History

The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies passed an order on 22.7.1999 declaring respondent no.1 as a deemed member. The society appealed to the Divisional Joint Registrar, who confirmed the order on 19.6.2001. The society then filed a writ petition in the High Court, which was dismissed on 21.4.2006.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 30
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Society Challenging Deemed Membership of Nominee. Nominee of Deceased Member Entitled to Membership Without Transfer of Shares Under Section 30 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Seeking Mandatory Deposit of VRS Benefits by Workmen Under MRTU & PULP Act. No Condition Precedent for Deposit Exists Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act for Challenging Voluntary Retirement Scheme.