High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals Against Interim Awards Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act — No Error Found in Tribunal's Grant of Rs.50,000 to Legal Heirs of Deceased Labourers in Truck Accident. The court held that the interim awards under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, were correctly granted and the appeals lacked merit.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves two first appeals filed by the National Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 28.2.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandrapur, in Motor Accident Claim Petition Nos.64/2006 and 65/2006. The Tribunal had allowed applications under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, awarding Rs.50,000 with simple interest at 7% per annum from the date of application till realization to the legal heirs of two deceased labourers, Bayabai w/o Shrawan Butle (aged 40) and Udhao s/o Narayan Butle (aged 46), who died in the same truck accident. The Insurance Company challenged these interim awards, arguing that the Tribunal erred in granting compensation under Section 140. The High Court, after hearing both sides, noted that the awards were interim in nature under the no-fault liability provision and that the Insurance Company had not pointed out any error in the Tribunal's order. Consequently, the court dismissed both appeals, finding no merit in them.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Section 140 - No-fault liability - Interim compensation - The Tribunal awarded Rs.50,000 with 7% interest under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to the legal heirs of deceased labourers who died in a truck accident. The Insurance Company appealed, but the High Court found no error in the Tribunal's order and dismissed the appeals. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal erred in granting interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to the legal heirs of deceased labourers who died in a truck accident, and whether the appeals against such interim awards are maintainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both First Appeal No.861/2012 and First Appeal No.859/2012 are dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 140 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • No-fault liability
  • Interim award
  • Appeal against interim award
  • No error in Tribunal's order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (11) 68

First Appeal No.861/2012 and First Appeal No.859/2012

2013-11-20

A.P. Bhangale

Shri Ajay Somani for appellant, Shri J.M. Gandhi for respondent no.4 (in FA 861/2012) and respondent no.3 (in FA 859/2012)

National Insurance Company Limited

Udhao s/o Narayan Butle and others (in FA 861/2012); Shrawan s/o Narayan Butle and others (in FA 859/2012)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against interim awards under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, in motor accident claim petitions.

Remedy Sought

The appellant (Insurance Company) sought to set aside the interim awards of Rs.50,000 each granted by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Filing Reason

The Insurance Company challenged the Tribunal's order granting interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to the legal heirs of deceased labourers.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandrapur, allowed applications under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and awarded Rs.50,000 with 7% interest per annum in MACP No.64/2006 and MACP No.65/2006, both dated 28.2.2011.

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in granting interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988? Whether the appeals against the interim awards are maintainable?

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant Insurance Company argued that the Tribunal erred in granting the interim awards. The respondents (legal heirs) supported the Tribunal's order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no error in the Tribunal's order granting interim compensation under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the awards were based on no-fault liability and the appeals lacked merit.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard. It is not in dispute that both the awards under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act arose out of the same incident of accident. In the result, both the appeals are dismissed. No order as to costs.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chandrapur, passed interim awards under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, on 28.2.2011 in MACP No.64/2006 and MACP No.65/2006. The Insurance Company filed First Appeal No.859/2012 and First Appeal No.861/2012 against these awards. The High Court heard the appeals and dismissed them on 20.11.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 140
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals Against Interim Awards Under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act — No Error Found in Tribunal's Grant of Rs.50,000 to Legal Heirs of Deceased Labourers in Truck Accident. The court ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Suitability Certificate for Rummy Competition — Holds Rummy as a Game of Skill Exempt from Gambling Laws. The court directed the police to issue a Suitability Certificate for the Rummy c...