Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Injured Driver Awarded Full Compensation for 100% Loss of Earning Capacity. Fracture of Tibia and Fibula Resulting in Permanent Disability to Drive Vehicle Justifies Compensation Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 96
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 21-02-2004 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act at Mumbai in Claim Application WCA No. 761/C-169 of 2000. The Commissioner had awarded a sum of Rs. 2,27,472/- with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the accident till realization to the claimant, Suryakant Damodar Meherkhambe, a driver who sustained serious injuries in a motor vehicle accident on 17-11-1999. The claimant, aged 38 years, was driving a motor vehicle (MH-05-D-1129) belonging to his employer, Nandu Tabaji Gite, and insured with the appellant insurer. He met with an accident at Beturkar Pada and sustained fracture of tibia and fibula (left leg) among other multiple injuries. He was admitted to Rajawadi Hospital, Ghatkopar from 17-11-1999 to 24-11-1999 and thereafter treated as an outdoor patient. As a result, he could no longer drive a vehicle or work as a driver, suffering 100% loss of earning capacity. His monthly salary was Rs. 3,000/-. The employer did not dispute the facts but contended that the insurer was liable. The insurer denied liability, arguing that the accident did not result in 100% permanent partial disability. The court considered the medical evidence, which showed tenderness at the fracture site, stiffness at the left ankle joint with restricted movements, and difficulty in walking, lifting heavy weights, and driving. The court held that the claimant had suffered 100% loss of earning capacity as he could not pursue his occupation as a driver. The appeal was dismissed, and the impugned judgment and order were confirmed.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Loss of Earning Capacity - Permanent Partial Disability - Section 4, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Claimant driver sustained fracture tibia and fibula left leg, resulting in stiffness at ankle joint and difficulty in walking - Medical evidence showed tenderness and restricted movements - Held that the claimant suffered 100% loss of earning capacity as he could no longer work as a driver, and the insurer was liable to pay compensation (Paras 3-5).

B) Workmen's Compensation - Interest on Compensation - Section 4A, Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Commissioner awarded interest at 12% per annum from date of accident till realization - Held that interest rate is justified as per statutory provisions (Para 1).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the claimant suffered 100% loss of earning capacity due to the accident and whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The impugned judgment and order dated 21-02-2004 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act at Mumbai in Claim Application WCA No. 761/C-169 of 2000 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 4
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Permanent partial disability
  • Burden of proof
  • Medical evidence
  • Interest rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 123

First Appeal No.1752 of 2005

2013-10-11

A. P. Bhangale, J.

Mr. S.M. Vidyarthi for the Appellant; Mr. Avinash Gokhale and S.U. Mehta for the Respondent No.1

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

Suryakant Damodar Meherkhambe and Shri Nandu Tabaji Gite

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Remedy Sought

The appellant insurer sought to set aside the award of compensation to the claimant driver.

Filing Reason

The insurer disputed the finding of 100% loss of earning capacity and its liability.

Previous Decisions

The Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act at Mumbai awarded Rs. 2,27,472/- with interest at 12% p.a. from date of accident till realization in Claim Application WCA No. 761/C-169 of 2000.

Issues

Whether the claimant suffered 100% loss of earning capacity due to the accident? Whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that there was no evidence that the driving license was cancelled and that the accident did not result in 100% permanent partial disability. Claimant argued that medical evidence supported 100% loss of earning capacity as he could no longer drive.

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant, a driver, sustained fracture of tibia and fibula resulting in stiffness at ankle joint and difficulty in walking, lifting heavy weights, and driving. Medical evidence established that he could no longer work as a driver, thus suffering 100% loss of earning capacity. The insurer is liable to pay compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Judgment Excerpts

As a result of the accident he is not in a position to drive the vehicle and cannot work as Driver. Thus he suffered 100% loss of earning capacity. Medical opinion supports the claimant that there is tenderness at the location of fracture, there is stiffness at left ankle joint resulting in restricted movements, with difficulty in walking, lifting heavy weights and driving.

Procedural History

The claimant filed Claim Application WCA No. 761/C-169 of 2000 before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation Act at Mumbai. The Commissioner awarded compensation on 21-02-2004. The insurer appealed to the High Court of Bombay by way of First Appeal No.1752 of 2005. The appeal was heard and dismissed on 11-10-2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 4, Section 4A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Injured Driver Awarded Full Compensation for 100% Loss of Earning Capacity. Fracture of Tibia and Fibula Resulting in Permanent Disability to Drive Vehicle Justifies Comp...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Special Pay Pension Case for Scientists. Special pay of Rs.2,000/- and Rs.4,000/- granted to Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS is to be counted for pension and pensionary benefits.