Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Driver's Permanent Disability. Employer and Insurer Held Jointly Liable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for 100% Loss of Earning Capacity Due to Accident During Employment.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 93
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sanjay Bhimrao Sule, a 33-year-old driver employed by respondent No.1 (Omkar Singh Harman Singh), met with a serious accident on 4 November 2004 on the Pune-Mumbai highway while driving a motor vehicle (No. MH-04-F-7938) owned by the employer. The vehicle was insured with respondent No.2 (New India Assurance Co. Ltd.) under a valid policy. The appellant sustained severe injuries, was initially treated at Khopoli Municipal Hospital, then shifted to Accident Hospital at Solapur on 12 November 2004, and discharged on 19 November 2004. He claimed that due to the injuries, he suffered 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver and filed an application under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (WCA No.586/C-230/2005) before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation. The insurer resisted the claim, alleging that the accident was due to the driver's own negligence (high speed and loss of control). The employer supported the claimant. The Commissioner partly allowed the application on 22 January 2009, awarding Rs.1,87,062/- with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of adjudication till realization, payable by the insurer and employer jointly. The appellant appealed, seeking enhancement of compensation and interest from the date of accident. The High Court considered the medical evidence and found that the appellant had suffered 100% functional disability as a driver, as he could no longer work in that capacity. The court held that the Commissioner erred in assessing disability at 50% and that the loss of earning capacity was total. Accordingly, the court enhanced the compensation to Rs.3,74,124/- (calculated as 60% of monthly wages of Rs.4000 x 209.14 factor for age 33). The court also modified the interest award, directing that interest at 12% p.a. be paid from the date of accident (4 November 2004) till realization, as per Section 4A of the Act. The employer and insurer were held jointly and severally liable. The appeal was partly allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Workmen's Compensation - Loss of Earning Capacity - Permanent Total Disablement - Section 4(1)(b) Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - The appellant-driver sustained serious injuries in an accident during employment, resulting in 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver. The Commissioner awarded compensation based on 50% disability, but the High Court held that the functional disability as a driver was 100%, warranting compensation under Section 4(1)(b) for permanent total disablement. (Paras 5-7)

B) Workmen's Compensation - Interest on Compensation - Section 4A Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - The Commissioner awarded interest at 12% p.a. from the date of adjudication. The High Court modified the order to award interest at 12% p.a. from the date of accident (04-11-2004) till realization, as per Section 4A(3) which mandates interest if compensation is not paid within one month of falling due. (Paras 8-9)

C) Workmen's Compensation - Joint Liability of Employer and Insurer - Section 3 Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - The employer and insurer are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation. The insurer cannot avoid liability on the ground of driver's negligence, as the accident arose out of and in the course of employment. (Paras 3, 10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant-driver is entitled to enhanced compensation for 100% loss of earning capacity due to injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident during the course of employment, and whether the insurer is liable to pay interest from the date of accident or from the date of adjudication.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. Compensation enhanced to Rs.3,74,124/- (Rupees Three Lakh Seventy Four Thousand One Hundred Twenty Four only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of accident (04-11-2004) till realization. The employer and insurer are jointly and severally liable. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
  • Section 4(1)(b)
  • Section 4A
  • Section 3
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Permanent total disablement
  • Interest on compensation
  • Joint liability of employer and insurer
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (10) 119

First Appeal No.495 of 2009

2013-10-07

A. P. Bhangale, J.

Mr. A.M. Gokhale for the Appellant, Mr. A.Z. Mookhtiar for the Respondent No.2

Shri Sanjay Bhimrao Sule

1. Mr. Omkar Singh Harman Singh, 2. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against judgment and award of Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation partly allowing claim for compensation for injuries sustained in motor vehicle accident during employment.

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.1,87,062/- to a higher amount and interest from the date of accident instead of from the date of adjudication.

Filing Reason

The appellant-driver sustained serious injuries in an accident during employment, resulting in 100% loss of earning capacity, but the Commissioner awarded compensation based on 50% disability and interest only from the date of adjudication.

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation partly allowed application WCA No.586/C-230/2005 on 22-01-2009, awarding Rs.1,87,062/- with interest at 12% p.a. from the date of adjudication till realization, payable by insurer and employer.

Issues

Whether the appellant is entitled to compensation for 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver? Whether the appellant is entitled to interest on compensation from the date of accident instead of from the date of adjudication?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that due to injuries, he suffered 100% loss of earning capacity as a driver and is entitled to compensation under Section 4(1)(b) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and interest from the date of accident. Insurer argued that the accident was due to the driver's own negligence (high speed and loss of control) and resisted the claim.

Ratio Decidendi

Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, when a workman suffers permanent total disablement resulting in 100% loss of earning capacity, compensation is to be calculated under Section 4(1)(b) based on 60% of monthly wages multiplied by the relevant factor. Interest under Section 4A(3) runs from the date of accident if compensation is not paid within one month of falling due. Negligence of the workman is not a defense for the insurer in a workmen's compensation claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is preferred against the Judgment and award dated 22-01-2009 passed by learned Commissioner for workman’s compensation in application WCA No.586/C-230/2005 whereby the application was partly allowed and the amount in the sum of Rs.1,87,062/ only was awarded @ interest at the rate of 12 % p.a. from the date of adjudication till the date it’s realization payable by the Insurer and the employer Mr.Onkarsingh Harnamsingh. In the present case, the appellant was a driver and due to the accident, he is unable to work as a driver. Therefore, his loss of earning capacity is 100%. The Commissioner erred in assessing the disability at 50% and awarding compensation accordingly. The appellant is entitled to compensation for permanent total disablement. Interest at the rate of 12% per annum shall be payable from the date of accident i.e. 04-11-2004 till realization.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application (WCA No.586/C-230/2005) before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, which was partly allowed on 22-01-2009. Aggrieved, the appellant filed the present First Appeal No.495 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court. The High Court heard the appeal and pronounced judgment on 07-10-2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 4(1)(b), Section 4A, Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Enhances Compensation for Driver's Permanent Disability. Employer and Insurer Held Jointly Liable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for 100% Loss of Earning Capacity Due t...
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Allows Appeal of Financial Creditor Against Classification as Unsecured Creditor in Liquidation Proceedings. The Tribunal remanded the matter for fresh consideration of whether the creditor's claim based on bill discounting facilities should be...