Bombay High Court Allows Second Set of Interrogatories in Civil Suit — No Bar Under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC. Trial court must consider interrogatories on merits rather than rejecting them solely on the ground that interrogatories were already delivered once.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, original plaintiff in Special Civil Suit No.164 of 2006, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 22.10.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur, below Exh.144/D. By the impugned order, the trial court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking permission to deliver interrogatories for the second time to the defendants. The trial court relied on the proviso to Order 11 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and held that interrogatories cannot be delivered a second time. The petitioner argued that there is no legal bar to delivering interrogatories more than once, while the respondents contended that the proviso restricts such delivery. The High Court examined Order 11 Rule 1 CPC and its proviso, which states that interrogatories shall be in form No.2 in Appendix B or such other form as the court may direct, with no restriction on the number of times they can be delivered. The Court observed that the trial judge had only considered the legal aspect and not the merits of the interrogatories. The High Court held that there is no prohibition in law against delivering interrogatories a second time, and the proviso does not impose any such restriction. The Court set aside the impugned order and directed the trial court to consider the application on its merits, including the relevance and propriety of the interrogatories. The writ petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Interrogatories - Order 11 Rule 1 CPC - Second Set of Interrogatories - The issue was whether a party can deliver interrogatories more than once to the same party - The Court held that there is no bar or restriction in law preventing a party from delivering interrogatories a second time, and the proviso to Rule 1 does not limit the number of times interrogatories can be delivered - The trial court must consider the application on its merits rather than rejecting it solely on the ground that interrogatories were already delivered once (Paras 4-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether interrogatories under Order 11 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 can be delivered to the same party for the second time?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 22.10.2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur, below Exh.144/D in Special Civil Suit No.164 of 2006 is set aside. The trial court is directed to consider the application at Exh.144/D on its own merits, including the relevance and propriety of the interrogatories. Rule is made absolute. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Interrogatories can be delivered more than once under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC
  • No bar to second set of interrogatories
  • Proviso to Order 11 Rule 1 does not restrict number of times
  • Trial court must consider interrogatories on merits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (09) 17

Writ Petition No. 10113 of 2012

2013-09-30

Mrs. Mridula Bhatkar

Smt. Anjali Bajpai Dube for petitioner, Mr. V.D. Gunale for respondents

M/s Kishorilal Babulal, a Registered Partnership Firm, Through its Partner Damodar s/o Mathurprasad Agarwal

Ramlal s/o Ganeshprasad Tiwari, Sachin s/o Ramlal Tiwari, Sunil s/o Ramlal Tiwari, Vidya d/o Ramlal Tiwari, Raksi d/o Ramlal Tiwari

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order rejecting an application for leave to deliver interrogatories for the second time.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner sought to set aside the order dated 22.10.2012 and to allow the application for delivering interrogatories for the second time.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the plaintiff's application for permission to deliver interrogatories for the second time, relying on the proviso to Order 11 Rule 1 CPC.

Previous Decisions

The trial court passed the impugned order dated 22.10.2012 below Exh.144/D in Special Civil Suit No.164 of 2006.

Issues

Whether interrogatories under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC can be delivered to the same party for the second time?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there is no bar in law to delivering interrogatories more than once. Respondents argued that the proviso to Order 11 Rule 1 CPC restricts the delivery of interrogatories to one time.

Ratio Decidendi

There is no bar or restriction in law preventing a party from delivering interrogatories more than once under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC. The proviso to Rule 1 does not limit the number of times interrogatories can be delivered. The trial court must consider the application on its merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant writ petition involves a short point, viz. whether the interrogatories under Order 11, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'C.P.C.') be delivered to the same party second time or not ? The learned Trial Judge did not permit the petitioner to deliver the interrogatories second time by relying on proviso to rule 1 of Order 11 of the C.P.C. In my view, the proviso to Rule 1 of Order 11 of the C.P.C. does not restrict the number of times the interrogatories can be delivered.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Suit No.164 of 2006 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Latur. The plaintiff delivered a first set of interrogatories. Subsequently, the plaintiff filed an application at Exh.144/D seeking leave to deliver a second set of interrogatories. The trial court rejected the application on 22.10.2012. The plaintiff then filed the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 11 Rule 1
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Set of Interrogatories in Civil Suit — No Bar Under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC. Trial court must consider interrogatories on merits rather than rejecting them solely on the ground that interrogatories were already delivered...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Patta Transfer as Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Public Interest and Personal Interest of Petitioner. The court held that a writ petition filed under the guise of public interest litigation, where the peti...