Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Employee in Caste Certificate Verification Case — Petitioner Permitted to Withdraw Petition with Liberty to Approach Appropriate Forum. Court directed no coercive steps for four weeks based on notice dated 16.7.2013 requiring submission of caste certificate, relying on earlier judgment in Ku. Vijaya Deorao Nandanwar.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sangramsingh Babusingh Chavhan, was appointed on the basis of a caste certificate belonging to 'Rajput Bhamta' and has been in service since 1980. On 16 July 2013, the Superintendent of Police, Nagpur (Rural) issued a notice directing the petitioner to submit his caste certificate by 31 July 2013. The petitioner filed a writ petition on 2 August 2013 challenging this notice. The High Court, relying on its earlier judgment in Ku. Vijaya Deorao Nandanwar v. Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Wardha (W.P. No. 5530/12 & ors., dated 10.7.2013), found that a prima facie case was made out for interim protection. However, noting that an alternate remedy was available, the court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum within four weeks. The court clarified that the protective order does not operate as a stay of the impugned notice but directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner based on the notice for a period of four weeks. The petitioner was also at liberty to apply afresh for protection before the appropriate forum. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, keeping all points open.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Caste Certificate Verification - Interim Protection - Petitioner appointed on basis of caste certificate of 'Rajput Bhamta' in service since 1980 - Impugned notice dated 16.7.2013 directed submission of caste certificate by 31.7.2013 - Court granted interim protection from coercive steps for four weeks, permitting withdrawal to approach appropriate forum - Held that prima facie case made out and protective order not a stay (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner, who was appointed based on a caste certificate of 'Rajput Bhamta' and has been in service since 1980, should be protected from coercive action pursuant to a notice directing him to submit a caste certificate by a specified date.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of with permission to withdraw and liberty to approach the appropriate forum within four weeks. The court directed that no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner based on the impugned notice for a period of four weeks. All points kept open.

Law Points

  • Interim protection
  • caste certificate verification
  • alternate remedy
  • coercive steps
  • protective order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (08) 142

Writ Petition No. 4253 of 2013

2013-08-07

Anoop V. Mohta, Z.A. Haq

Mr. Prafulla S. Khubalkar for Petitioner, Mrs. Maldhure, Asstt. Govt. Pleader for Respondents

Sangramsingh Babusingh Chavhan

The State of Maharashtra, The Director General of Police, The Superintendent of Police, Nagpur (Rural)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging a notice directing submission of caste certificate.

Remedy Sought

Protection from coercive action based on the impugned notice.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was directed by respondent no. 3 to submit caste certificate by 31.7.2013, and he sought protection from adverse action.

Previous Decisions

The court relied on its earlier judgment in Ku. Vijaya Deorao Nandanwar v. Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Wardha.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim protection from coercive steps based on the notice dated 16.7.2013.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he was appointed on the basis of a caste certificate and has been in service since 1980, and that the notice was unjustified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found a prima facie case for interim protection, but noted the availability of an alternate remedy. It permitted withdrawal and granted temporary protection from coercive action for four weeks.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the averments made and in view of judgment of this Court ... in the case of Ku. Vijaya Deorao Nandanwar ... we are inclined to extend protection to the petitioner at this stage, as prima facie case is made out. It is made clear that the protective order in no way be treated as stay to the impugned communication/notice.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition on 02.08.2013 challenging notice dated 16.07.2013. Court heard the matter on 07.08.2013 and disposed of the petition with interim protection for four weeks.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes MCOCA Prosecution for Invalid Sanction — Lack of Application of Mind by Sanctioning Authority. Sanction under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 must reflect due consideration of material; me...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Protection to Employee in Caste Certificate Verification Case — Petitioner Permitted to Withdraw Petition with Liberty to Approach Appropriate Forum. Court directed no coercive steps for four weeks based on notice d...