Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Liability Despite Cheque Bounce in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Third Parties Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Contract of Insurance Not Void Ab Initio; Insurer Can Recover Premium from Insured.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Bhaskar Bramhane, a coolie, died while boarding a travel bus (No. MH27/A9240) at Bori Arab village, District Amravati. The bus was driven by respondent no.1, owned by respondent no.2 (Balwant Transport Company), and insured with the appellant, Oriental Insurance Company. The claimants, being the widow, children, and father of the deceased, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, which awarded compensation of Rs. 3,70,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum from 14.7.2004. The insurance company appealed, arguing that the cheque issued for the premium had bounced, rendering the insurance contract void ab initio, and thus they were not liable. The court examined the legal position regarding dishonour of cheque for premium. It noted that under Section 64VB of the Insurance Act, 1938, risk is not assumed until premium is paid, but the contract is not void ab initio. The court relied on precedents including National Insurance v. Seema Malhotra and New India Assurance v. Anjanabai, which held that the insurer is liable to third parties but can recover the amount from the insured. The court found that the insurance company had not cancelled the policy before the accident, and therefore remained liable. The court dismissed the appeal on liability but reduced the interest rate from 7.5% to 6% per annum, as the rate was considered on the higher side. The judgment upholds the principle that third-party victims should not suffer due to disputes between insurer and insured.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Third Party Liability - Dishonour of Cheque for Premium - Insurer's Liability - The issue was whether the insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties when the cheque for premium was dishonoured. The court held that the contract of insurance is not void ab initio and the insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties, but can recover the amount from the insured. (Paras 3-5)

B) Insurance Law - Contract of Insurance - Premium Payment - Section 64VB Insurance Act, 1938 - The court distinguished between void and voidable contracts, holding that dishonour of cheque does not make the contract void ab initio, but the insurer can avoid liability only if the contract is cancelled before the accident. (Paras 4-5)

C) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Interest Rate - The court reduced the rate of interest from 7.5% to 6% per annum, following the principle that interest should be reasonable and not punitive. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to third parties when the cheque issued for premium was dishonoured, thereby rendering the insurance contract void ab initio.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed on the question of liability. The insurance company is directed to pay the compensation amount to the claimants and is entitled to recover the same from the insured (respondent no. 2). The rate of interest is reduced from 7.5% to 6% per annum.

Law Points

  • Contract of insurance not void ab initio upon cheque dishonour
  • insurer liable to third parties
  • insurer can recover from insured
  • Section 147 Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 64VB Insurance Act
  • 1938
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 172

First Appeal No. 1291 of 2009

2013-07-24

A. P. Bhangale, J

Ms M. A. Naik for appellant, Mr Bharat Vora for respondent no. 1, Mr N. R. Saboo for respondents no. 6 and 7

The Oriental Insurance Company

Smt. Gitabai Wd/o Bhaskar Brahmane & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment and award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal granting compensation to claimants for death in motor accident.

Remedy Sought

Appellant insurance company sought to set aside the award on the ground that the insurance policy was void due to dishonour of cheque for premium.

Filing Reason

The insurance company contended that the cheque issued for premium had bounced, rendering the insurance contract void ab initio, and thus they were not liable to pay compensation.

Previous Decisions

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, in Claim Petition No. 325 of 2004, awarded compensation of Rs. 3,70,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum from 14.7.2004, holding the insurance company liable.

Issues

Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to third parties when the cheque for premium was dishonoured? Whether the contract of insurance is void ab initio upon dishonour of cheque? Whether the rate of interest awarded by the Tribunal is excessive?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The cheque for premium had bounced, so the contract of insurance was void ab initio; reliance on National Insurance v. Seema Malhotra and New India Assurance v. Anjanabai. Respondents (Claimants): The insurance company is liable to third parties; the policy was not cancelled before the accident.

Ratio Decidendi

The contract of insurance is not void ab initio upon dishonour of cheque for premium. The insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties, but can recover the amount from the insured. The insurer must cancel the policy before the accident to avoid liability.

Judgment Excerpts

Being aggrieved by the judgment and Award dated 1.3.2008 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati in Claim Petition No. 325 of 2004 granting compensation of Rs. 3,70,000/ (inclusive of nofault claim) to be paid by respondents no. 1 to 3 to the original claimants together with interest @ 7.5% per annum from 14.7.2004. Learned counsel for appellant submits that the date on which accident had occurred, the bus in question was not insured at all. He further submits that the cheque issued by respondent no. 2 towards premium had bounced and, therefore, contract of insurance was rendered void.

Procedural History

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati, passed judgment and award on 1.3.2008 in Claim Petition No. 325 of 2004, granting compensation of Rs. 3,70,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum from 14.7.2004. The insurance company filed First Appeal No. 1291 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the award on the ground of cheque bounce. The appeal was heard and decided on 24.7.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 147
  • Insurance Act, 1938: Section 64VB
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Liability Despite Cheque Bounce in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Third Parties Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Contract of Insurance Not Void Ab Initio; Insurer Can Recover Premium from Insur...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cruelty by Husband and Mother-in-Law in Dowry Harassment Case. Demand for Motorcycle and Payment of Debt Constitutes Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC.