Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Requiring Separate Valuation and Court Fees for Joint Will Probate. Court Holds That a Joint Will Executed by Testator and Testatrix Constitutes a Single Subject for Probate, Attracting Single Court Fee Under Bombay Court Fees Act.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 93
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6 February 2013 in a Testamentary Petition for probate of a joint will executed by Kantilal Mehta and his wife Induben Mehta. The will was executed by both on the same date and time. The Single Judge held that the estate of both testators must be separately valued and that the petitioner must pay separate court fees for the grant of probate of each testator's will. The appellant, Dr. Akshay Kantilal Mehta, as executor, appealed against this order. The Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, consisting of Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and S.C. Gupte JJ., allowed the appeal. The Court examined Sections 18 and 23 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, and Article 10 of the Schedule. Section 18 provides for aggregate fees in multifarious suits, but the Court held that a joint will is a single subject, not a multifarious suit. Section 23 provides that when a grant of probate is made for the whole estate, no further fee is chargeable for a like grant. The Court concluded that the petition for probate of a joint will is for one subject, and court fee is payable on the aggregate value of the estate of both testators, not separately. The Single Judge's order was set aside, and the petition was directed to proceed on the basis that the court fee is payable on the aggregate value of the estate.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Joint Will - Probate - Court Fees - A joint will executed by a testator and testatrix on the same date and time is a single testamentary instrument - The petition for probate of such joint will is for a single subject, not a multifarious suit - The court fee is payable on the aggregate value of the estate of both testators, not separately - Section 18 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959, which deals with multifarious suits, does not apply to a joint will - Section 23 of the Act provides relief when a grant is made in respect of the whole estate - The Single Judge's order requiring separate valuation and separate court fees was erroneous (Paras 2-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a joint will executed by a testator and testatrix requires separate valuation and separate court fees for the estate of each testator for the purpose of probate.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Order of Learned Single Judge dated 6 February 2013 set aside. The Testamentary Petition shall proceed on the basis that the court fee is payable on the aggregate value of the estate of both the testator and testatrix.

Law Points

  • Joint will is a single testamentary instrument
  • probate of joint will is a single grant
  • court fee payable on aggregate value of estate
  • Section 18 Bombay Court Fees Act applies to multifarious suits not to joint wills
  • Section 23 Bombay Court Fees Act provides relief for several grants
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 54

Appeal (Lodg.) No.172 of 2013 in Testamentary Petition No.1239 of 2012

2013-07-02

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, S.C. Gupte

Ms. Mandakini D.S. Sinh for the Appellant, Mr. P.G. Lad for the State

Dr. Akshay Kantilal Mehta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order of Learned Single Judge in Testamentary Petition regarding court fees for probate of joint will.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of Single Judge's order requiring separate valuation and separate court fees for probate of joint will.

Filing Reason

The Single Judge directed separate valuation and separate court fees for the estate of testator and testatrix in a joint will probate petition.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge order dated 6 February 2013 held that estate of both testators must be separately valued and separate court fees paid.

Issues

Whether a joint will executed by testator and testatrix requires separate valuation and separate court fees for probate.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that joint will is a single instrument and probate is for one subject, so court fee should be on aggregate value.

Ratio Decidendi

A joint will executed by a testator and testatrix is a single testamentary instrument. The petition for probate of such joint will is for a single subject, not a multifarious suit. Therefore, court fee is payable on the aggregate value of the estate of both testators, not separately. Section 18 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, which deals with multifarious suits, does not apply to a joint will.

Judgment Excerpts

In our view, the Learned Single Judge is in error in requiring a separate valuation to be made both of the estate of the testator and the testatrix and in directing that the Court fee shall be paid for the grant of probate of the wills executed by the testator and the testatrix separately valuing their shares in the joint immovable properties. There is one joint will executed by the testator and the testatrix. Probate has been sought of the joint will executed by both the testator and the testatrix. The subject matter of the petition for probate is one viz. the probate of the joint will.

Procedural History

The Testamentary Petition No.1239 of 2012 was filed for probate of a joint will. The Learned Single Judge passed an order on 6 February 2013 requiring separate valuation and separate court fees. The appellant filed Appeal (Lodg.) No.172 of 2013 against that order. The Division Bench heard the appeal and delivered judgment on 2 July 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959: 18, 23, Schedule Article 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge Order Requiring Separate Valuation and Court Fees for Joint Will Probate. Court Holds That a Joint Will Executed by Testator and Testatrix Constitutes a Single Subject for Probate, Attracting Singl...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman with 75% Backwages in Unfair Dismissal Case. Employer's challenge to Labour Court order dismissed; workman's cross-petition for full backwages partly allowed.