Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application for Transfer of Divorce Petition from Parbhani to Aurangabad on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship. Section 24 of CPC applied to transfer proceedings under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant wife and respondent husband married on 3 July 2011 at Aurangabad. After marriage, the wife resided with the husband at Parbhani. On 16 April 2012, the wife went with the husband to Solapur, but thereafter she was forced to leave the matrimonial home and has been residing with her parents at Aurangabad. The husband filed a divorce petition (Hindu Marriage Petition No. 131 of 2012) before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani. The wife filed the present application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of that petition to the Family Court at Aurangabad. The wife contended that she has no independent income, is unable to bear travel expenses, has a small child to care for, and that her parents are old and cannot accompany her. The husband opposed the transfer, arguing that the wife is educated and can travel. The court considered the principles governing transfer under Section 24 CPC, noting that the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration, especially when she has no independent income and has to travel with a child. The court found that the balance of convenience was in favor of the wife and that she would suffer hardship if required to travel to Parbhani. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and directed the transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 131 of 2012 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani to the Family Court at Aurangabad. The court also directed the Family Court at Aurangabad to decide the petition expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of receipt of the record.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Transfer of divorce petition from Parbhani to Aurangabad - Wife sought transfer on grounds of lack of independent income, inability to travel, and need to care for minor child - Court held that convenience of wife must be considered, especially when she has no independent income and has to travel with a child - Petition allowed (Paras 2-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the divorce petition filed by the husband at Parbhani should be transferred to Aurangabad at the wife's request on grounds of her convenience and inability to travel.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. Hindu Marriage Petition No. 131 of 2012 pending before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani is transferred to Family Court at Aurangabad. Family Court to decide expeditiously, preferably within six months from receipt of record.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings
  • convenience of wife
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Section 19 Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • hardship
  • balance of convenience
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (07) 8

Misc. Civil Application No. 78 of 2012

2013-07-15

S.S. Shinde

Mr. Durgesh M. Pingale for applicant, Mr. A.T. Jadhavar for respondent sole

Smita w/o Dhananjay Patil

Dhananjay Krishnakumar Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application under Section 24 of CPC for transfer of divorce petition from Parbhani to Aurangabad.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No. 131 of 2012 from Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani to Family Court at Aurangabad.

Filing Reason

Wife unable to travel to Parbhani due to lack of independent income, need to care for minor child, and old parents.

Previous Decisions

Husband filed divorce petition at Parbhani; wife filed transfer application.

Issues

Whether the divorce petition should be transferred from Parbhani to Aurangabad on grounds of wife's convenience.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant wife: No independent income, unable to bear travel expenses, has small child, parents old and cannot accompany, hardship if required to travel to Parbhani. Respondent husband: Wife is educated and can travel; no sufficient grounds for transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

In transfer applications under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife is a paramount consideration, especially when she has no independent income and has to travel with a child. Balance of convenience lies in favor of the wife to avoid hardship.

Judgment Excerpts

It is the case of the applicant that, the marriage between the applicant and the respondent is solemnized on 3rd July, 2011 at Vishvarup Hall, Aurangabad. The applicant has no independent income and she is unable to bear the expenses of travelling from Aurangabad to Parbhani. In the facts of this case, the balance of convenience is in favour of the applicant and she would suffer hardship if she is required to travel to Parbhani.

Procedural History

Husband filed Hindu Marriage Petition No. 131 of 2012 before Civil Judge, Senior Division, Parbhani. Wife filed Misc. Civil Application No. 78 of 2012 under Section 24 CPC for transfer. Heard and allowed on 15 July 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Application for Transfer of Divorce Petition from Parbhani to Aurangabad on Grounds of Convenience and Hardship. Section 24 of CPC applied to transfer proceedings under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Interim Injunction in Arbitration Matter — Government Restrained from Interfering with Contractor's Work. Performance Guarantee Encashment Found Wrongful; Mandatory Injunction for Reimbursement of Rs.5,50,00,000/...