Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Dhule to Kopargaon on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's Convenience and Safety Precedence Over Husband's Choice of Forum Under Section 24 CPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sunita Manoj Goud, filed a Miscellaneous Civil Application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.258 of 2011 from the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule to the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon. The applicant and respondent were married on 20th April 2006 at Fattepur, Rajasthan, and after marriage resided at Dhule. They have two daughters, Disha (three years old) and Janvi (eight months old at the time of filing). The applicant alleged that the respondent subjected her to cruelty and harassment for bringing insufficient dowry, and she was forced to leave the matrimonial home and reside with her parents at Shirdi, which falls under the jurisdiction of Kopargaon court. The respondent filed the Hindu Marriage Petition for restitution of conjugal rights at Dhule. The applicant contended that she had no independent income, had to travel 150 km from Shirdi to Dhule with two minor daughters, and faced safety issues. The respondent opposed the transfer, arguing that the applicant had filed a criminal complaint at Dhule and that the distance was not a hardship. The court considered the convenience of the wife, the need to care for young children, and the fact that the wife had to travel with infants. The court held that the wife's convenience should be given precedence and allowed the transfer, directing that the petition be transferred from Dhule to Kopargaon. The court also directed the parties to appear before the transferee court on 6th May 2013.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Convenience of Wife - The wife sought transfer of a Hindu Marriage Petition filed by the husband from Dhule to Kopargaon, where she resided with her minor daughters. The court held that the wife's convenience and safety, along with the need to care for young children, outweighed the husband's convenience, and allowed the transfer. (Paras 5-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Hindu Marriage Petition pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule should be transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon on the ground of convenience of the wife and her minor children.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the application and directed that Hindu Marriage Petition No.258 of 2011 pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule be transferred to the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon. The parties were directed to appear before the transferee court on 6th May 2013.

Law Points

  • Transfer of matrimonial proceedings
  • convenience of wife
  • Section 24 CPC
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (04) 4

Misc. Civil Application No. 58 of 2011

2013-04-01

S.S. Shinde

Shri Amol Gandhi for applicant, Shri R.C. Patil for respondent

Sunita Manoj Goud

Manoj Sagarmal Goud

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer of matrimonial proceedings under Section 24 CPC

Remedy Sought

Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.258 of 2011 from Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dhule to Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kopargaon

Filing Reason

Wife's convenience and safety, as she resides with her parents at Shirdi (under Kopargaon jurisdiction) and has to travel 150 km with two minor daughters to attend court at Dhule

Issues

Whether the Hindu Marriage Petition should be transferred from Dhule to Kopargaon on grounds of convenience of the wife and minor children.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant (wife) argued that she has no independent income, has to travel 150 km with two minor daughters (aged 3 years and 8 months), and faces safety issues; she resides with her parents at Shirdi under Kopargaon jurisdiction. Respondent (husband) opposed transfer, stating that the applicant had filed a criminal complaint at Dhule and that the distance is not a hardship.

Ratio Decidendi

In matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife, especially when she has to care for minor children and has no independent income, should be given precedence over the husband's choice of forum. The court has the power under Section 24 CPC to transfer proceedings to a court where the wife resides to ensure her safety and convenience.

Judgment Excerpts

It is well settled that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is to be considered. The applicant has to travel from Shirdi to Dhule which is about 150 kms. She has to take care of her two minor daughters. Therefore, it would be difficult for her to travel such a long distance. In the circumstances, the application deserves to be allowed.

Procedural History

The applicant filed Misc. Civil Application No. 58 of 2011 under Section 24 CPC seeking transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition No.258 of 2011 filed by the respondent at Dhule. The court heard both parties and allowed the transfer on 1st April 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Hindu Marriage Petition from Dhule to Kopargaon on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's Convenience and Safety Precedence Over Husband's Choice of Forum Under Section 24 CPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Duty Case Due to Statutory Interpretation. Levy Under Bihar Electricity Duty Act 1948 Not Applicable as Supply Was to Licensee, Not Consumer as Defined Under Sections 2(b) and 2(ee).