Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration as Nominated Councilor in Municipal Council — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Nomination Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965. The court held that nomination under Section 10 of the Act is a discretionary power of the State Government and cannot be claimed as a matter of right, thus no writ of mandamus lies.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 38
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Vinod Gopichand Rathod, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Collector, Parbhani, to declare him as a nominated councilor of the Municipal Council, Jintur. The petitioner claimed to be a social worker and legal practitioner. The respondents included the State of Maharashtra, the Collector, the Sub Divisional Officer, the Municipal Council, and several individuals. The court heard arguments from the petitioner's counsel, the Assistant Government Pleader for respondent nos. 1 to 3, and counsel for respondent no. 4 and respondent nos. 5 & 7 to 12. The court noted that the petitioner's prayer was for issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Collector to declare him as a nominated councilor. The court examined the relevant provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, particularly Section 10 which deals with nomination of councilors. The court held that the power of nomination under Section 10 is discretionary and vested in the State Government. No person has a legal right to be nominated, and the court cannot issue a writ of mandamus to compel the exercise of such discretionary power. The petitioner failed to establish any legal right or that the respondents had a corresponding duty to nominate him. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition. The judgment was delivered by Justice R.M. Borde and Justice U.D. Salvi on 5th February 2013.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law - Nomination of Councilors - Section 10 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 - The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to be declared as a nominated councilor. The court held that nomination under Section 10 is a discretionary power of the State Government and cannot be claimed as a matter of right. The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to show any legal right or that the respondents had a duty to nominate him. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to be declared as a nominated councilor of the Municipal Council, Jintur, and whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Collector to nominate him.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Nomination of councilors under Section 10 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils
  • Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act
  • 1965 is a discretionary power of the State Government
  • not a matter of right
  • no writ of mandamus can be issued to compel nomination.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (02) 10

Writ Petition No.301 of 2012

2013-02-05

R.M. Borde, U.D. Salvi

Mr. N.L. Jadhav for petitioner; Mr. V.D. Rakh, A.G.P. for respondent nos.1 to 3; Mr. S.S. Rathi for respondent no.4; Mr. S.T. Veer for respondent nos.5 & 7 to 12

Vinod s/o Gopichand Rathod

The State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Department, through its Secretary; The Collector, Parbhani; The Sub Divisional Officer, Sailu; The Municipal Council, Jintur, through its Chief Officer; Pathan Nafeesa Bee Khalek; Pathan Amina Begam Mubsarkha; Farooqui Kafilur Raheman Inaytur; Ghuge Arun Asaram; Sau. Doefode Kalpana Manohar; Shaikh Khaleel Shaikh Budhan; Reshma Begam Kareem Kha; Deshmukh Pratap Vinayakrao

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking mandamus to declare petitioner as nominated councilor.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Collector to declare him as a nominated councilor of Municipal Council, Jintur.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed entitlement to be nominated as a councilor under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has a legal right to be nominated as a councilor. Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Collector to nominate the petitioner.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is entitled to be declared as a nominated councilor. Respondents contended that nomination is a discretionary power and the petitioner has no right to claim it.

Ratio Decidendi

The power of nomination under Section 10 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 is discretionary and cannot be enforced by a writ of mandamus. No person has a legal right to be nominated as a councilor.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is praying for issuance of writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction in the like nature to Respondent No.2 Collector, Parbhani, to declare him as a nominated Councilor of Municipal Council, Jintur. The power of nomination under Section 10 of the Act is discretionary and cannot be claimed as a matter of right.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.301 of 2012 in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was reserved on 18th December 2012 and pronounced on 5th February 2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965: Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration as Nominated Councilor in Municipal Council — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Nomination Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 196...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes Revenue Orders in Land Dispute, Upholds Civil Decree and Will-Based Transfer Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code