Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Tenancy Extinction Case — Collapse of Tenement Ends Tenancy Regardless of Cause. Tenancy extinguishes upon destruction of tenanted premises, and tenant cannot claim restoration of land under general law.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 17
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, a tenant of a tenement (House No. 83) in Comba, Margao, filed a suit alleging that the respondents damaged and demolished the tenement on 22 July 1979. He sought recovery of possession of the land and restoration of the tenement. The respondents contended that the structure was old and crumbling, and due to heavy rains, part of it collapsed in July 1979; the tenant had already vacated before the collapse. The trial court found that the tenement collapsed due to rains, the subject matter was not in existence, and the plaintiff was not in occupation, thus dismissing the suit. The first appellate court affirmed, holding that the tenancy ended with the collapse. The second appeal was admitted on the substantial question of law: whether tenancy extinguishes after collapse of tenement whatever the reasons may be. The High Court, per N. A. Britto, J., held that the tenancy extinguishes upon the destruction of the tenement, regardless of the cause of collapse. The court reasoned that the tenancy is tied to the existence of the tenement; once the tenement is destroyed, the tenancy ceases. The tenant's right to restoration of the land does not survive the destruction. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts' decisions.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Tenancy Extinction - Collapse of Tenement - Whether tenancy extinguishes after collapse of tenement whatever the reasons may be for the collapse - The court considered whether a tenant's right to restoration of land and tenement survives the destruction of the tenanted premises - Held that tenancy extinguishes upon collapse of the tenement regardless of the cause, and the tenant cannot claim restoration of the land (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the tenancy extinguishes after collapse of tenement whatever the reasons may be for the collapse?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. The tenancy extinguishes upon collapse of the tenement regardless of the reasons for the collapse.

Law Points

  • Tenancy extinguishes upon destruction of tenement
  • tenant's right to restoration of land does not survive collapse
  • no distinction between natural and man-made collapse for tenancy extinction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (09) 68

Second Appeal No. 16 of 1997

2005-09-02

N. A. Britto

Mr. M. S. Sonak for Appellant, Mr. C. A. Coutinho for Respondent

Shri Shivram Ladu Nitardekar

Shri Alex Fernandes, Smt. Vistalia Fernandes, Shri Lusta Baptista (since deceased) represented by legal heirs, Smt. Maria Lusta Baptista

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal by plaintiff-tenant against dismissal of suit for possession and restoration of tenement.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought recovery of possession of land and restoration of tenement.

Filing Reason

Appellant alleged respondents damaged and demolished the tenement on 22 July 1979.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed suit; first appellate court affirmed dismissal.

Issues

Whether tenancy extinguishes after collapse of tenement whatever the reasons may be for the collapse?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that tenancy should not extinguish if collapse was due to landlord's act. Respondents argued that tenancy ends with destruction of premises regardless of cause.

Ratio Decidendi

Tenancy is tied to the existence of the tenement; upon its destruction, the tenancy ceases and the tenant cannot claim restoration of the land.

Judgment Excerpts

Whether the tenancy extinguishes after collapse of tenement whatever the reasons may be for the collapse? There is no dispute that the plaintiff was the tenant of the respondent in respect of a tenement bearing House No. 83... The learned Civil Judge... came to the conclusion that the tenement/structure had collapsed due to the rains... The first appellate Court concluded that... the plaintiff's tenancy ended there.

Procedural History

Suit filed on 30 November 1979 in R.C.S. No. 253/79/C. Trial court dismissed suit. First appeal dismissed. Second appeal admitted on 17 April 1997 on substantial question of law. Heard and dismissed on 2 September 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal in Tenancy Extinction Case — Collapse of Tenement Ends Tenancy Regardless of Cause. Tenancy extinguishes upon destruction of tenanted premises, and tenant cannot claim restoration of land under general la...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Citizenship and Police Verification Requirements for Security Guards Under Private Security Agencies Act. Provisions Held to Be Reasonable Restrictions in Interest of Public Order and Security.