Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The court found that the husband's desertion and cruelty were proved, reversing the trial court's dismissal.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 172
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Mrs. Conceicao Fernandes, filed a suit for divorce and dissolution of marriage against her husband, Milagres Fernandes, under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The marriage was solemnized on 14th May 1994. The wife alleged that before marriage, she had represented to the husband that she could not stay at his small house in Assolna, and they agreed to live at her mother's house in Digas, Panchwadi. After marriage, they lived there, but soon disputes arose. The husband would come home under the influence of alcohol and harass her. In July 1994, the wife went to England for employment. She returned in November 1994 due to her mother's report of harassment. During her stay until December 1994, the husband ill-treated her and her mother. She returned to England in December 1994. In May 1995, the husband left the house permanently. The wife alleged that the husband caused injuries to her body and abandoned her. She claimed divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion. The husband filed a written statement denying the allegations. He claimed that after marriage they lived at Assolna, and later shifted to Digas at the wife's instance. He alleged humiliation and harassment by the wife's brother. He admitted leaving the house in May 1995 but claimed it was due to ill-treatment. He denied cruelty and asserted readiness to live with the wife. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding that the wife failed to prove cruelty and desertion. On appeal, the High Court re-appreciated the evidence. The court noted that the husband admitted leaving the matrimonial home in May 1995 and did not return despite the wife's efforts. The wife's evidence of cruelty, including injuries, was corroborated by medical evidence. The court found that the husband's conduct amounted to cruelty and desertion. The court held that the wife had proved both grounds under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The appeal was allowed, the trial court's judgment was set aside, and a decree of divorce was granted.

Headnote

A) Matrimonial Law - Divorce - Cruelty and Desertion - Section 10, Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - The wife sought divorce alleging physical and mental cruelty by husband and his desertion. The trial court dismissed the suit. On appeal, the High Court re-appreciated evidence and found that the husband's conduct of leaving the matrimonial home and not returning despite wife's efforts constituted desertion, and his behavior under influence of alcohol and causing injuries amounted to cruelty. Held that the wife proved both grounds and granted decree of divorce (Paras 2-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the wife is entitled to a decree of divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Judgment and decree of trial court dated 22nd December 2000 set aside. Decree of divorce granted dissolving the marriage between the parties.

Law Points

  • Cruelty
  • Desertion
  • Burden of proof in matrimonial cases
  • Appreciation of evidence in divorce suits
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (10) 40

First Appeal No. 146 of 2001

2005-10-28

R. M. Lodha, J.

Ms. S. Naik for Appellant, Shri Shivan S. Dessai for Respondent

Mrs. Conceicao Fernandes

Mr. Milagres Fernandes

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Matrimonial suit for divorce and dissolution of marriage

Remedy Sought

Decree of divorce and dissolution of marriage by wife against husband

Filing Reason

Alleged cruelty and desertion by husband

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the suit on 22nd December 2000

Issues

Whether the wife proved cruelty by the husband? Whether the wife proved desertion by the husband?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (wife) argued that husband harassed her under influence of alcohol, caused injuries, and left the matrimonial home permanently in May 1995. Respondent (husband) denied cruelty and alleged that he left due to ill-treatment by wife's brother, and that wife did not join him.

Ratio Decidendi

The husband's admission of leaving the matrimonial home in May 1995 and not returning, coupled with evidence of cruelty including injuries, constitutes both cruelty and desertion under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, entitling the wife to a decree of divorce.

Judgment Excerpts

This First Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 22nd December, 2000 passed by the Civil Judge, S.D., Ponda in Matrimonial Civil Suit No.10/2000/A whereby the said Court dismissed the suit for divorce and dissolution of marriage filed by the present appellant. Conceicao Fernandes and Milagres Fernandes are the parties to the litigation. They are wife and husband.

Procedural History

Wife filed Matrimonial Civil Suit No.10/2000/A before Civil Judge, S.D., Ponda seeking divorce. Suit dismissed on 22nd December 2000. Wife appealed to High Court of Bombay at Goa vide First Appeal No. 146 of 2001. High Court allowed appeal on 28th October 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Divorce Act, 1869: Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The court found that the husband's desertion and cruelty were proved, reversing the trial court's dismissal.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Quashing of FIR Set Aside — Supreme Court Reiterates Limits of Section 482 CrPC in Property Fraud Cases.