Case Note & Summary
The petitioner, Dr. Sadiq Khan, was a student admitted to the Diploma in Orthopaedics course at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Navi Mumbai, in August 2003. The admission was based on approvals from the Government of India (5.12.2002) and the State Government (26.12.2002), and he was selected through the Central admissions procedure conducted by respondent No.2-DMER. However, the University of Mumbai informed him by letter dated 24th November 2003 that the Diploma course had not been introduced in the University till then and that the eligibility certificate issued to him was inadvertent. The University also referred to its earlier letter dated 4th March 2003 to the College not to enrol any student to this course. The petitioner challenged this communication and also the subsequent letter dated 30th June 2004 and the Academic Council resolution dated 18th June 2004 approving the course only from the academic year 2004-2005. The court considered the submissions of the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Aney, who argued that the course was approved by the Government of India on 5.12.2002 and by the State Government on 26.12.2002, which stated that the course was approved from the year 2002-03. The court held that the petitioner had a legitimate expectation that his admission would be recognized, and the university could not deny recognition after having issued an eligibility certificate. The court allowed the petition and directed the university to recognize the petitioner's admission.
Headnote
A) Administrative Law - Legitimate Expectation - Admission to Diploma Course - University's refusal to recognize admission despite government approval - Petitioner admitted in August 2003 after Central admissions procedure based on approvals from Government of India (5.12.2002) and State Government (26.12.2002) - University later informed that course not introduced and eligibility certificate issued inadvertently - Held that petitioner had legitimate expectation that his admission would be recognized, and university could not deny recognition after having issued eligibility certificate (Paras 2-3).
Issue of Consideration
Whether a student admitted to a diploma course with government approval can be denied recognition by the university on the ground that the course was not introduced in the university.
Final Decision
The court allowed the petition and directed the university to recognize the petitioner's admission.
Law Points
- Administrative law
- Legitimate expectation
- Estoppel
- University regulations
- Admission procedure





