Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Grants Divorce by Mutual Consent Under Section 32-B of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 — Parties Lived Separately for Over a Year, No Possibility of Reconciliation. The court held that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that the consent was free and voluntary, satisfying the requirements for mutual divorce.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 139
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This is a suit for divorce by mutual consent filed by Hormazd Kersi Irani (Plaintiff No.1) and Dilnaz Hormazd Irani (Plaintiff No.2) under Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. The parties, both Parsi Zoroastrians, were married on 21st April 2001 according to Parsi Zoroastrian rites and customs. Serious disputes arose between them, and since 14th September 2001, the Second Plaintiff has permanently moved out of the matrimonial home. Both parties testified in support of their case for divorce by mutual consent. The court, after recording evidence, found that the marriage was solemnized under the Act, the averments in the plaint were true, and the consent of either party was not obtained by force or fraud. The court observed that a divorce by mutual consent is in the interest of both parties, and since they have lived apart for a period in excess of one year, there is no possibility of reconciliation. Accordingly, the suit was decreed in terms of the prayer clauses (a) and (b), with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Parsi Law - Divorce by Mutual Consent - Section 32-B Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Consent and Living Apart - The court considered whether the marriage had broken down irretrievably and whether the consent of both parties was free and voluntary. The court held that the marriage was solemnized under the Act, the averments in the plaint were true, and the consent was not obtained by force or fraud. Since the parties had lived apart for over a year and reconciliation was impossible, the court decreed the divorce. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 should be granted when the parties have lived apart for more than one year and there is no possibility of reconciliation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Divorce by mutual consent
  • Section 32-B Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act
  • 1936
  • irretrievable breakdown of marriage
  • consent not obtained by force or fraud
  • living apart for more than one year
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 142

Parsi Suit No.5 of 2005

2005-03-24

Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.

Ms. Nilesha Jain i/b M/s. Joy Legal Consultants for Plaintiff No.1, Ms. Aban Patel for Plaintiff No.2

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Suit for divorce by mutual consent under Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.

Remedy Sought

Decree of divorce by mutual consent.

Filing Reason

Serious disputes between the parties leading to separation since 14th September 2001.

Issues

Whether the marriage has broken down irretrievably and the parties have lived apart for more than one year. Whether the consent of both parties is free and voluntary, not obtained by force or fraud.

Submissions/Arguments

Both parties testified in support of the divorce by mutual consent. The court found the averments in the plaint to be true and consent not obtained by force or fraud.

Ratio Decidendi

A divorce by mutual consent under Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 can be granted when the marriage is solemnized under the Act, the averments in the plaint are true, the consent is not obtained by force or fraud, and the parties have lived apart for more than one year with no possibility of reconciliation.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a suit for divorce by mutual consent under Section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. I am of the view, on the basis of the evidence which has been recorded, that the marriage has been solemnised under the provisions of the Act; that the averments in the plaint are true and that the consent of either party to the suit was not obtained by force or fraud. A divorce by mutual consent is in the interest of both the parties and having regard to the fact that they have lived apart for a period in excess of one year, there is no possibility now of a reconciliation.

Procedural History

The suit was filed as Parsi Suit No.5 of 2005 in the Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court at Bombay. Both parties gave evidence. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 24th March 2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936: 32-B
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Interplay Between Section 17A and Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 156(3) CrPC in Context of Prior Approval for Investigation Against Public Servants. The court framed questions of law regarding the necess...