Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit Valuation Dispute — Amendment Act Retrospectively Bars Jurisdiction of Civil Judge Senior Division Over Suits Valued Above Rs. 5 Lakhs. The court held that Section 26A of the Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965, as amended in 2004, applies retrospectively to pending suits and requires transfer to the District Court.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 43
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, The Corlim Education Society, was defendant No.1 in Special Civil Suit No.137/1991/A filed by respondent No.1, Shri Nicolou M. Dias, in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji. The Government of Goa was defendant No.2. During the pendency of the suit, the Government of Goa issued a notification dated 16.3.2004 amending the Goa Civil Courts Act by the Amendment Act, 2004, inserting Section 26A. This section provided that all suits received or registered before the commencement of the Amendment Act, where the valuation exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs, shall be transferred to the District Court, and the Civil Judge Senior Division shall have no jurisdiction to try such suits. The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division to continue trying the suit, arguing that the amendment retrospectively barred such jurisdiction. The court considered the language of Section 26A, which explicitly states that it applies to suits received or registered before the commencement of the Amendment Act, and that the Civil Judge Senior Division shall have no jurisdiction to try such suits. The court held that the amendment is retrospective in operation and clearly ousts the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division over suits valued above Rs. 5 lakhs. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, the judgment and decree of the trial court were set aside, and the suit was directed to be transferred to the District Court for disposal. The court also ordered that the parties bear their own costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction - Retrospective Amendment - Section 26A Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965 - Amendment Act 2004 inserted Section 26A providing that all suits received or registered before commencement of the Amendment Act shall be transferred to the District Court if the valuation exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs, and the Civil Judge Senior Division shall have no jurisdiction to try such suits - The court held that the amendment is retrospective in operation and applies to pending suits, thereby ousting the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division and requiring transfer to the District Court (Paras 3-6).

B) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suits - Pending Suits - Section 26A Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965 - The provision mandates transfer of all suits pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division where the valuation exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs to the District Court - The court held that the amendment clearly bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division and the suit must be transferred to the District Court for disposal (Paras 4-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Amendment Act of 2004, which inserted Section 26A in the Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965, retrospectively bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division to try suits valued above Rs. 5 lakhs and requires transfer of such pending suits to the District Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji in Special Civil Suit No.137/1991/A are set aside. The suit is directed to be transferred to the District Court for disposal in accordance with law. The parties shall bear their own costs.

Law Points

  • Retrospective operation of amendment
  • jurisdiction of civil courts
  • valuation of suit for jurisdiction
  • transfer of pending suits
  • bar on jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 83

First Appeal No. 219 of 2004

2005-03-24

A.P. Lavande, J.

Mr. D. Pangam for appellant, Mr. M. C. Fernandes for respondent No.1, Mr. M.S. Joshi, Addl. Government Advocate for respondent No.2

The Corlim Education Society

Shri Nicolou M. Dias and The Government of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal challenging jurisdiction of Civil Judge Senior Division to try a suit valued above Rs. 5 lakhs after amendment of the Goa Civil Courts Act.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the judgment and decree of the trial court and to transfer the suit to the District Court on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction.

Filing Reason

The appellant contended that the Amendment Act, 2004 inserting Section 26A retrospectively barred the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division to try suits valued above Rs. 5 lakhs.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji) had passed a judgment and decree in Special Civil Suit No.137/1991/A, which was challenged in this appeal.

Issues

Whether Section 26A of the Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965, as amended in 2004, applies retrospectively to pending suits and bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division to try suits valued above Rs. 5 lakhs.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the amendment is retrospective and ousts the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division, requiring transfer to the District Court. Respondent No.1 opposed the appeal, but the court found the amendment clear and retrospective.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 26A of the Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965, as inserted by the Amendment Act of 2004, is retrospective in operation and applies to all suits received or registered before its commencement. It bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge Senior Division to try suits where the valuation exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs and mandates transfer of such pending suits to the District Court.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 26A, as amended, reads as under: '26A. Transfer of pending suits and bar on jurisdiction. - All suits received or registered under the said Act before the commencement of the Goa Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004, where the valuation exceeds Rs. 5 lakhs, shall be transferred to the District Court and the Civil Judge, Senior Division shall have no jurisdiction to try such suits.' The amendment is retrospective in operation and clearly bars the jurisdiction of the Civil Judge, Senior Division to try the suit.

Procedural History

Respondent No.1 filed Special Civil Suit No.137/1991/A before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Panaji. During its pendency, the Goa Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004 was enacted, inserting Section 26A. The appellant challenged the jurisdiction of the trial court. The trial court proceeded and passed a decree. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 219 of 2004 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, which was heard and disposed of on 24.3.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Civil Courts Act, 1965: 26A
  • Goa Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 2004:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Minority Institution's Petition Against AICTE's Refusal to Grant Approval for Engineering Course, Following Earlier Decisions in Similar Matters. The court held that the issues were identical to those in Saraswati Education S...