Bombay High Court Allows Parole for Convict in Murder Case Due to Family Needs and Good Conduct. Convict eligible under Prison Rules after serving half of 5-year sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Abdul Sheikh, a convict serving a 5-year rigorous imprisonment sentence under Sections 304(I) and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a Criminal Writ Petition seeking parole for 60 days. He had already served 2.5 years of his sentence. The grounds for parole were that his mother was seriously ill, he wished to see his newborn daughter, and there was no male member in his family to make arrangements. The State of Goa, through the Inspector General of Prisons, opposed the petition, filing an affidavit stating that the victim's wife, Mrs. Hasina Bi Sayed, objected to the release on the ground that the petitioner had threatened them with dire consequences after his release. The court considered that the petitioner had previously been released on parole and had surrendered on time without any untoward incident, complying with all conditions. The court found this to be a fit case for granting parole, noting that the petitioner was eligible under the Prison Rules having served half his sentence. To address the victim family's apprehensions, the court imposed conditions. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to release the petitioner on parole for 60 days from the date of release, subject to execution of a personal bond.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Parole - Eligibility - Convict who has undergone 2.5 years of a 5-year sentence is eligible for parole under Prison Rules - Court granted parole for 60 days to attend to ailing mother and see newborn daughter, despite objections from victim's family - Held that previous good conduct on parole and imposition of conditions mitigate security concerns (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a convict who has served half of his sentence and has a good previous parole record should be granted parole for family reasons despite objections from the victim's family.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Criminal Writ Petition allowed. Respondents directed to release petitioner on parole for 60 days from date of release, subject to execution of a personal bond.

Law Points

  • Parole granted to prisoner who has served half of sentence
  • eligibility under Prison Rules
  • conditions imposed to address security concerns
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (06) 37

Criminal Writ Petition No.33 of 2004

2005-06-09

V.M. Kanade

Mr. V. Pangam (for petitioner, absent), Mrs. W. Coutinho (Additional Public Prosecutor for respondents)

Abdul Sheikh

State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking parole

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought parole for 60 days to attend to ailing mother, see newborn daughter, and make family arrangements

Filing Reason

Petitioner's mother was seriously ill, he wanted to see his newborn daughter, and there was no male member in the family

Previous Decisions

Petitioner was convicted under Sections 304(I) and 323 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment; he had already served 2.5 years; he was previously released on parole and surrendered on time

Issues

Whether the petitioner should be granted parole for family reasons despite objections from the victim's family

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that his mother is seriously ill and he needs to see his newborn daughter and make family arrangements Respondent State opposed on ground that victim's wife objected due to threats of dire consequences after release

Ratio Decidendi

A convict who has served half of his sentence and has a good previous parole record is eligible for parole under Prison Rules; objections from victim's family can be addressed by imposing conditions, and parole should be granted for genuine family needs.

Judgment Excerpts

In my view this is a fit case for granting parole. The petitioner on an earlier occasion was released on parole and had thereafter surrendered to the police authorities after the parole period was over and at that time no untoward incident had taken place and had complied with the conditions imposed by them while he was granted parole.

Procedural History

Petitioner was convicted under Sections 304(I) and 323 r/w 34 IPC and sentenced to 5 years rigorous imprisonment. He filed Criminal Writ Petition No.33 of 2004 seeking parole. State filed affidavit opposing. Court heard parties and allowed petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 304(I), 323, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Parole for Convict in Murder Case Due to Family Needs and Good Conduct. Convict eligible under Prison Rules after serving half of 5-year sentence for culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Civil Procedure Dispute Over Maintainability of Appeal Against Consent Decree. Court Held That Party to Suit Can Directly File First Appeal Under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Despite Section 96(3) Bar...