Bombay High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal, Upholds Tribunal's Deletion of Addition for Education Fund and Remand for College Fund. Contributions to Education Fund Under Section 68 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Deemed Not Income; College Fund Issue Remanded to Determine Factual Basis.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal before the Bombay High Court was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92. The respondent assessee, a cooperative sugar factory, had collected amounts under two heads: Education Fund and College Fund. The Assessing Officer added these amounts as income of the assessee, which the assessee contested before the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the contribution to the Education Fund, being recovered under Section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, and following a decision of the Bombay High Court in Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., was not income and directed its deletion. Regarding the College Fund, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine whether the amount was deducted at the instance of the Sugar Controller; if it was, the addition would be unsustainable as a non-trading receipt under the Special Bench decision in Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. The Revenue contended that both funds constituted taxable income and the Tribunal’s directions were erroneous. The High Court, after hearing both sides, observed that the Education Fund issue was squarely covered by the High Court precedent and no substantial question survived. On the College Fund, the court found the remand to be a proper course since there was no authority directly on point, and the direction to ascertain the factual basis was justified. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the Tribunal’s order in its entirety.

Headnote

A) Income Tax – Education Fund – Section 68, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 – Contributions to Education Fund recovered by a cooperative sugar factory under Section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act are not income – Tribunal directed deletion of addition for Education Fund for A.Y. 1990-91, following the decision of the Bombay High Court in Krishna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (Income Tax Reference No.61/98) (Paras 2, 4-5).

B) Income Tax – College Fund – Taxability – Amount collected towards College Fund by the assessee-society was remanded by the Tribunal to the Assessing Officer to determine whether the deduction was made at the instance of the Sugar Controller – If so, it would be covered in favour of the assessee by the Special Bench decision in Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (198 ITR 78 AT); otherwise, the Assessing Officer is at liberty to decide in accordance with law – High Court upheld this direction as proper and dismissed the Revenue's appeal (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that if the College Fund collected is at the instance of a sugar control order, the addition on account of college fund cannot be sustained being a non-trading receipt.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The Tribunal's order deleting the addition for Education Fund and remanding the College Fund issue is upheld.

Law Points

  • Contributions to Education Fund recovered under Section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act are not income
  • amounts collected towards College Fund may be non-trading receipt if deducted at instance of Sugar Controller
  • otherwise to be decided on facts.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 122

Income Tax Appeal No.29 of 1999

2005-07-04

S. Radhakrishnan, J.H. Bhatia

Dr. P. Daniel for the Appellant, Mr. S.N. Inamdar for the Respondent

The Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Spl. R-2, Aurangabad

Vinayak Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Remedy Sought

The Revenue sought to set aside the Tribunal's order and restore the additions made by the Assessing Officer in respect of Education Fund and College Fund.

Filing Reason

The Assessing Officer had treated the collections under Education Fund and College Fund as taxable income of the assessee society, which the Tribunal partly deleted and partly remanded.

Previous Decisions

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, in Appeals No. 913/PN/1997 and 914/PN/1997, deleted the addition for Education Fund and remanded the College Fund issue to the Assessing Officer.

Issues

Whether the contribution to Education Fund recovered under Section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act can be treated as income. Whether the Tribunal was justified in remanding the issue of College Fund to the Assessing Officer to determine if the amount was collected at the instance of the Sugar Controller.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant (Revenue) contended that the amounts collected towards Education Fund and College Fund constituted income and were rightly added by the Assessing Officer. The respondent (assessee) argued that the Education Fund collection was statutory and not income, and the direction to remand the College Fund issue was proper.

Ratio Decidendi

Contributions to Education Fund recovered under Section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act are not income and are liable to be excluded. Where the taxability of a collection like College Fund depends on the factual determination of whether it was deducted under the directions of a statutory authority, remand to the Assessing Officer is the correct course.

Judgment Excerpts

contribution to the Education Fund were directed to be deleted by the Tribunal, holding that such contribution is not an income as it is recovered under section 68 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The Tribunal has remanded the matter to the Assessment Officer with the direction to find out whether the aforesaid amount was deducted at the instance of Sugar Controller.

Procedural History

The assessee filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the assessment orders for the years 1990-91 and 1991-92. The Tribunal, vide orders in Appeal Nos. 913/PN/1997 and 914/PN/1997, deleted the addition made on account of Education Fund and remanded the issue of College Fund to the Assessing Officer. The Revenue, being aggrieved, preferred the present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: 260A
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act: 68
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty, Acquits Mother-in-law of Cruelty in Dowry Death Case. The court found that the husband's conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder and Section 498A IPC for cruelty was based on...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal, Upholds Tribunal's Deletion of Addition for Education Fund and Remand for College Fund. Contributions to Education Fund Under Section 68 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act Deemed Not Income; Colle...