Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Enhanced Maintenance to Wife Under Section 127 CrPC. Enhancement of maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month upheld as reasonable and not excessive.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 35
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Gangadhar Narhari Kedare, is the husband of the respondent, Sonyabai Gangadhar Kedare. The respondent-wife had initially filed an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for maintenance, which was granted at Rs.250 per month. Subsequently, the wife filed an application under Section 127(1) of the same Code seeking enhancement of the maintenance amount. The Judicial Magistrate First Class enhanced the monthly maintenance to Rs.1000 from the date of the order. Both parties challenged this order by filing separate revision applications. The husband's revision was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, by judgment and order dated 18th January 2005. The husband then filed the present criminal writ petition challenging the revisional order. The High Court heard the petitioner's counsel and noted that the quantum of maintenance enhanced to Rs.1000 per month was reasonable and not excessive. The court found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the petition, upholding the enhanced maintenance.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Maintenance - Enhancement under Section 127 CrPC - The wife sought enhancement of maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month under Section 127(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - The Magistrate allowed the enhancement - The husband challenged the order in revision, which was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge - The High Court held that the quantum of Rs.1000 per month was reasonable and not excessive, and no interference was warranted (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the enhancement of maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month under Section 127(1) CrPC was justified and whether the revisional court erred in confirming it.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the order of the Additional Sessions Judge and the enhanced maintenance of Rs.1000 per month.

Law Points

  • Maintenance enhancement under Section 127 CrPC
  • Reasonable maintenance quantum
  • No interference in revision
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 109

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1035 of 2005

2005-07-11

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Shri Peter Lobo with Shri Sachin D. Kadam for the Petitioner, Ms. Rajeshree Gadhavi for the Respondent-State

Gangadhar Narhari Kedare

Sou.Sonyabai Gangadhar Kedare

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition challenging the order of Additional Sessions Judge dismissing revision against enhancement of maintenance.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner (husband) sought to quash the order enhancing maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month.

Filing Reason

The husband was aggrieved by the enhancement of maintenance granted to his wife under Section 127(1) CrPC.

Previous Decisions

The Judicial Magistrate First Class enhanced maintenance to Rs.1000 per month; the Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the husband's revision.

Issues

Whether the enhancement of maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month under Section 127(1) CrPC was justified.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the enhancement was excessive and not justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The quantum of maintenance enhanced to Rs.1000 per month was reasonable and not excessive; no interference was warranted in the revisional order.

Judgment Excerpts

The quantum of maintenance enhanced to Rs.1000 per month was reasonable and not excessive.

Procedural History

The wife filed an application under Section 125 CrPC for maintenance, which was granted at Rs.250 per month. She then filed an application under Section 127(1) CrPC for enhancement, which was allowed by the JMFC enhancing maintenance to Rs.1000 per month. The husband filed a revision before the Additional Sessions Judge, which was dismissed. The husband then filed the present criminal writ petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 125, 127(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Enhanced Maintenance to Wife Under Section 127 CrPC. Enhancement of maintenance from Rs.250 to Rs.1000 per month upheld as reasonable and not excessive.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Abetment of Suicide Case — Love Affair and Quarrel Not Sufficient to Prove Abetment. Prosecution Failed to Establish Instigation or Intent Under Section 306 IPC as Deceased Acted on Her Own Volition.