Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Eight Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Common Judgment Acquits All Accused Charged Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 IPC for Murder of Bharat Koli and Hurt to Yeshwant Koli.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 72
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a common judgment dated 26.7.1989 of the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, acquitting eight accused persons in Sessions Case Nos. 641/87, 142/88 and 328/88. The accused were charged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 323 IPC for the murder of Bharat Sadashiv Koli and causing hurt to Yeshwant Gagaram Koli on 19.9.1987 at about 11 pm at Shashtri Nagar, within Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane. The prosecution alleged that on the eve of Ganesh immersion procession, there was a quarrel between the accused (who were drunk) and the deceased Bharat Koli, and a scuffle had occurred the previous evening between accused no.1 Raju and the deceased. The trial court, after considering the evidence, acquitted all accused. The High Court, in the appeal, examined whether the acquittal was perverse. The court noted that the prosecution relied on interested witnesses whose testimony was found unreliable. The High Court held that the trial court's findings were based on proper appreciation of evidence and were not perverse. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed and the acquittal was upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Appeal against acquittal - Appreciation of evidence - Standard of proof - The High Court in an appeal against acquittal can interfere only if the trial court's findings are perverse or unreasonable, not merely because a different view is possible - Held that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt (Paras 1-2).

B) Criminal Law - Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common intention - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 IPC - The alleged incident occurred on 19.9.1987 at 11 pm at Shashtri Nagar, Thane - The prosecution case relied on interested witnesses whose testimony was found unreliable - The trial court acquitted all eight accused - Held that the acquittal was based on proper appreciation of evidence and no interference was called for (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court's acquittal of all accused persons for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 323 IPC was perverse or unreasonable, warranting interference by the High Court.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both criminal appeals are dismissed. The acquittal of all respondents is upheld.

Law Points

  • Appreciation of evidence in criminal appeal against acquittal
  • standard of proof
  • credibility of witnesses
  • common intention
  • unlawful assembly
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (07) 93

Criminal Appeal No.735 of 1989 and Criminal Appeal No.737 of 1989

2005-07-07

Smt. Ranjana Desai, D.B. Bhosale

Mr P.S. Hingorani (APP for Appellant-State), Mr C.R. Sonawane (for respondents, absent)

The State of Maharashtra

1. Raju Ramdas Shahu, 2. Ashok Shankar Labhake, 3. Vasant Savalaram Labhade, 4. Ramchandra Piraji Yadav, 5. Vijay Sundar Shetty, 6. Sundar Padma Pujari (in Criminal Appeal No.735/1989) and 1. Kishor Shankar Labhade (in Criminal Appeal No.737/1989)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals by the State against acquittal of accused persons for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 and 323 IPC.

Remedy Sought

The State sought reversal of the trial court's acquittal and conviction of the respondents.

Filing Reason

The State challenged the common judgment and order dated 26.7.1989 of the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, acquitting all eight accused.

Previous Decisions

The trial court acquitted all accused persons in Sessions Case Nos. 641/87, 142/88 and 328/88.

Issues

Whether the trial court's acquittal was perverse or unreasonable, warranting interference by the High Court.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant-State argued that the trial court erred in acquitting the accused despite sufficient evidence. The respondents' advocate was absent and did not make submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court in an appeal against acquittal can interfere only if the trial court's findings are perverse or unreasonable. The trial court's appreciation of evidence was proper and not perverse, hence no interference is warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

These Appeals are directed against a common Judgment and order dated 26.7.1989 rendered by the learned Vth Addl.Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case Nos. 641/87, 142/88 and 328/88, by which all the eight accused involved in all the three Sessions Cases have been acquitted.

Procedural History

The trial court (Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Thane) acquitted all eight accused in Sessions Case Nos. 641/87, 142/88 and 328/88 on 26.7.1989. The State filed two appeals (Criminal Appeal No.735/1989 and Criminal Appeal No.737/1989) against the common judgment. The High Court heard the appeals and dismissed them on 7.7.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Eight Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Common Judgment Acquits All Accused Charged Under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 323 IPC for Murder of Bharat Koli and Hurt t...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Breach of Consent Order in Property Dispute. Court holds that undertaking to vacate premises by a specified date does not constitute an unequivocal undertaking to the court, and breach of a co...