Bombay High Court Upholds DNA Test Order in Divorce Case to Determine Paternity of Child Born from Second Marriage. The court held that DNA test is a scientific method to determine paternity and is in the interest of justice to ascertain the truth under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-husband, Sunil Eknath Trambake, and the respondent-wife, Leelavati Sunil Trambake, were married on 4th April 1986 and had a female child. Due to differences, the husband filed a divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, being H.M.P. No.195/95. The wife alleged that the husband solemnized a second marriage on 25th March 1996 with one Smt. Meena Chandrakant Nirphale and fathered a son named Rupesh, born on 3rd December 1997. The husband denied the paternity of Rupesh. After evidence was laid and arguments heard, the wife filed an application (Exhibit-173) seeking a DNA test of the husband and the child to determine paternity. The trial court allowed the application by order dated 29th November 2002, directing the husband to make himself available for the DNA test and to secure the presence of Rupesh before the Civil Surgeon, Civil Hospital, Nasik on 12th December 2002. The husband challenged this order by way of a writ petition. The High Court, while admitting the petition, granted a stay on the execution of the impugned order. The High Court heard the matter and upheld the trial court's order, holding that a DNA test is a scientific method to determine paternity and is in the interest of justice to ascertain the truth. The petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Paternity - DNA Test - Section 13 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - In a divorce petition, the wife sought a DNA test to prove that the child Rupesh was born from the husband's second marriage - The trial court allowed the application - The High Court upheld the order, holding that DNA test is a scientific method to determine paternity and is in the interest of justice to ascertain the truth (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in ordering a DNA test of the petitioner-husband and the child Rupesh to determine paternity in a divorce proceeding under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the trial court's order directing the petitioner-husband to undergo DNA test along with the child Rupesh.

Law Points

  • DNA test
  • paternity
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • divorce
  • evidence
  • best evidence rule
  • matrimonial dispute
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (12) 1

Writ Petition No.184 of 2003

2005-12-01

D.B. Bhosale, J.

Ms. Sharvari Y. Jahagirdhar for the petitioner, Mr. P.N. Joshi for the respondent

Sunil Eknath Trambake

Leelavati Sunil Trambake

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the trial court's order allowing DNA test in a divorce proceeding.

Remedy Sought

The petitioner-husband sought to quash the order directing DNA test of himself and the child Rupesh.

Filing Reason

The petitioner-husband denied paternity of the child Rupesh, born from his alleged second marriage.

Previous Decisions

The trial court allowed the wife's application for DNA test; the High Court granted stay on execution of that order.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in ordering a DNA test to determine paternity in a divorce case.

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent-wife argued that DNA test is necessary to prove paternity of the child Rupesh. The petitioner-husband opposed the DNA test, denying the allegations of second marriage and paternity.

Ratio Decidendi

DNA test is a scientific method to determine paternity and is in the interest of justice to ascertain the truth in matrimonial disputes.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition is directed against the order dated 29.11.2002 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nasik on the application Exhibit-173 filed in H.M.P. No.195/95 by which the said application filed by the respondent-wife seeking D.N.A. test of the petitioner and child - Rupesh was allowed.

Procedural History

The petitioner-husband filed H.M.P. No.195/95 under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for divorce. The wife filed application Exhibit-173 seeking DNA test. The trial court allowed the application on 29.11.2002. The husband filed Writ Petition No.184 of 2003 challenging that order. The High Court admitted the petition and granted stay. After hearing, the High Court dismissed the petition on 01.12.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds DNA Test Order in Divorce Case to Determine Paternity of Child Born from Second Marriage. The court held that DNA test is a scientific method to determine paternity and is in the interest of justice to ascertain the truth un...
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. The court held that the driver of the offending vehicle was negligent in not controlling the speed and not keeping p...