Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Transfer of Investigation in Alleged Hush-Up of Crime. Court finds no merit in allegations of biased investigation and upholds police investigation as proper.

High Court: Bombay High Court
  • 73
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Rita Shailesh Vyas, filed a criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation in C.R.No.64 of 2004 from Kandivli (West) Police Station to DCB CID, Mumbai. She alleged that the investigation was conducted in a haphazard manner to hush-up the crime and protect the accused. The petitioner was married to Shailesh Vyas (since deceased) in 1982 and they had three children. The deceased suffered from asthma and heart ailment. The court examined the investigation and found that the police had conducted a proper investigation. The court dismissed the petition, holding that there was no merit in the allegations and no ground for transfer of investigation.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Transfer of Investigation - Bias Allegations - Petitioner sought transfer of investigation from local police to DCB CID alleging haphazard investigation and suppression of evidence - Court examined the investigation and found no merit in allegations - Held that the investigation was proper and no case for transfer made out (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the investigation in C.R.No.64 of 2004 should be transferred to DCB CID on the ground that it was carried out in a haphazard manner to hush-up the crime and protect the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer of investigation
  • Bias in investigation
  • Hushing up of crime
  • Suppression of evidence
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005:BHC-AS:15064-DB

Criminal Writ Petition No.1718 of 2004

2005-08-25

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, P.V. Kakade

2005:BHC-AS:15064-DB

Mr. S.V. Marwadi for Petitioner, Mr. B.H. Mehta APP for State, Mr. H.H. Pimpale with Ms. Trupti Puranik for Municipal Corporation

Rita Shailesh Vyas

State of Maharashtra, The Commissioner of Police Greater Mumbai, The Additional Commissioner of Police North Thakur Complex Kandivli (West) Mumbai, The Deputy Commissioner of Police North Zone Borivli Mumbai, The Senior Inspector of Police Kandivli (West) Police Station Kandivli (West) Mumbai, Mr. Kadlak Inspector of Police Kandivli (West) Police Station Mumbai, Mr. Padval Inspector of Police Kandivli (West) Police Station Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking transfer of investigation from local police to DCB CID.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought order of transfer of investigation in C.R.No.64 of 2004 to DCB CID, Mumbai.

Filing Reason

Allegation that investigation was carried out in haphazard manner to hush-up the crime and protect the accused.

Issues

Whether the investigation in C.R.No.64 of 2004 should be transferred to DCB CID on the ground of biased and haphazard investigation?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that investigation was conducted in haphazard manner to hush-up the crime and protect the accused.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no merit in the allegations of biased investigation and held that the investigation was proper, thus no ground for transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

By the present Petition the Petitioner is seeking the Order of transfer of the investigation in C.R.No.64 of 2004 lodged with Kandivli (West) Police Station to DCB CID, Crowford Market, Mumbai on the ground that the investigation has been carried out not only in haphazard manner, but to hush-up the crime by suppressing the facts and destroying the material pieces of evidence as well as with the intention to protect the accused contrary to the provisions of law.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No.1718 of 2004 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking transfer of investigation. The court heard the matter and dismissed the petition on 25th August 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Transfer of Investigation in Alleged Hush-Up of Crime. Court finds no merit in allegations of biased investigation and upholds police investigation as proper.