Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery with Deadly Weapon in Farm House Attack. Appellant convicted under Section 392 read with 397 IPC for robbery with deadly weapon based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Maruti Bhaga Salonkhe, was convicted under Section 392 read with 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for robbery with a deadly weapon. The incident occurred on 30 August 1997 at a farm house in Vavarle, Khalapur, Raigad. The complainant, P.W.7 Lancy Jamesh Nazreth, along with his cousin P.W.8 Calveen Benedit and others, were attacked by three persons armed with a chopper, knife, and sword. The assailants demanded Rs. 2 lakhs, inflicted injuries with the weapons, and snatched gold chains, cash, a wrist watch, and champagne bottles. The appellant was identified as one of the assailants. The trial court convicted the appellant, and he appealed. The High Court examined the evidence, including the testimony of P.W.7 and P.W.8, which was found to be consistent and credible. Medical evidence corroborated the injuries. The court held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction and sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Robbery with Deadly Weapon - Section 392 r/w 397 IPC - Conviction upheld - The appellant was convicted for robbery with a deadly weapon (chopper, knife, sword) at a farm house. The court found the eyewitness testimony of P.W.7 and P.W.8 credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The appeal was dismissed. (Paras 1-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 392 read with 397 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 392 r.w. 397 IPC is upheld.

Law Points

  • Robbery with deadly weapon
  • Section 392 read with 397 IPC
  • Identification of accused
  • Credibility of eyewitness testimony
  • Medical evidence corroboration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (08) 60

Criminal Appeal No.734 of 2002

2005-08-25

Smt. V.K. Tahilramani

Mr. Arfan A.E. Sait (appointed) for Appellant, Mr. Rajesh More A.P.P. for the State

Maruti Bhaga Salonkhe

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for robbery with deadly weapon.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 392 r.w. 397 IPC and sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment.

Previous Decisions

The trial court (IInd Ad-hoc Asstt. Sessions Judge, Raigad) convicted the appellant on 30.7.2001 in Sessions Case No.52 of 1998.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 392 read with 397 IPC is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Not mentioned in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction under Section 392 read with 397 IPC is sustainable as the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has been convicted under Section 392 r.w. 397 of IPC and sentenced to R.I. for 7 years. The prosecution story briefly stated is as under: ...

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the IInd Ad-hoc Asstt. Sessions Judge, Raigad on 30.7.2001 in Sessions Case No.52 of 1998. He appealed to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which dismissed the appeal on 25.8.2005.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 392, 397
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery with Deadly Weapon in Farm House Attack. Appellant convicted under Section 392 read with 397 IPC for robbery with deadly weapon based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Adoption Dispute — Invalidates Adoption for Non-Compliance with Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Adoption of a married person above 15 years and age gap less than 21 years violates Sections 10 and ...