Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Injunction Based on Deed of Relinquishment. Deed of Relinquishment executed by appellant in 1960 held to be valid and binding, entitling the father to seek injunction against appellant.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for injunction filed by the father of the appellant (deceased Hariba). The suit was based on a deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant on 14th July 1960. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the appellate court passed a decree in view of the deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant in respect of the suit property. In a suit for partition filed by the appellant/defendant, reliance was placed by the brothers of the appellant on the said deed of relinquishment. The appellate court in an appeal arising out of the said suit for partition has accepted the deed of relinquishment. The High Court, in this second appeal, considered whether the deed of relinquishment was valid and binding. The court noted that the appeal was admitted as a companion appeal to Second Appeal No.59 of 1989, and no substantial question of law was framed. The court upheld the appellate court's decree, finding that the deed of relinquishment was valid and binding, and the appellant was bound by it. The court dismissed the second appeal, affirming the decree of the appellate court.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Deed of Relinquishment - Validity and Binding Nature - The suit for injunction was based on a deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant on 14th July 1960. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the appellate court decreed it in view of the deed. The High Court held that the deed of relinquishment was valid and binding, and the appellate court's decree was justified. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant on 14th July 1960 is valid and binding, and whether the appellate court was justified in passing a decree based on the said deed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Second Appeal dismissed. The decree of the appellate court is affirmed. The deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant on 14th July 1960 is held to be valid and binding.

Law Points

  • Deed of relinquishment
  • validity of relinquishment
  • binding nature of relinquishment
  • injunction based on relinquishment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (04) 169

Second Appeal No. 100 of 1989

2005-04-13

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Shri S.M.Railkar i/by Shri G.R.Rege for the Appellant. None for the Respondents.

Mahadeo Hariba Kumbhar

Hariba Subhana Kumbhar, since deceased by heirs: 1. Vishwanath Hariba Kumbhar, 4. Shivdas Hariba Kumbhar, 3. Kashinath Hariba Kumbhar, 8. Ramling Hariba Kumbhar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Second appeal against decree in suit for injunction based on deed of relinquishment.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the appellate court's decree granting injunction based on deed of relinquishment.

Filing Reason

Appellant filed second appeal against the appellate court's decree which granted injunction in favor of the father based on a deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant.

Previous Decisions

Trial court dismissed the suit; appellate court decreed the suit in view of the deed of relinquishment.

Issues

Whether the deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant on 14th July 1960 is valid and binding. Whether the appellate court was justified in passing a decree based on the deed of relinquishment.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the deed of relinquishment was not valid or binding. Respondents (brothers) relied on the deed of relinquishment in a partition suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The deed of relinquishment executed by the appellant is valid and binding, and the appellate court was justified in passing a decree based on it.

Judgment Excerpts

The case made out in the suit is based on deed of relinquishment executed on 14th July 1960 by the Appellant. The Appellate Court has passed a decree in view of the deed of relinquishment executed by the Appellant in respect of the suit property.

Procedural History

Suit for injunction filed by father (deceased Hariba) based on deed of relinquishment dated 14th July 1960. Trial court dismissed suit. Appellate court decreed suit. Appellant filed second appeal. Second appeal admitted on 25th July 1989 as companion to Second Appeal No.59 of 1989. Present judgment dated 13th April 2005.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Injunction Based on Deed of Relinquishment. Deed of Relinquishment executed by appellant in 1960 held to be valid and binding, entitling the father to seek injunction against appellant.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Eviction of Licensee in Leave and License Dispute — Licensee Cannot Claim Tenancy Rights After Expiry of Agreement. The court held that a licensee who continues in possession after expiry of leave and license agreement with...