Supreme Court Upholds Appellant in Arbitration Act Case — Award Governed by Indian Law.

In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from agreements between the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) and the Singer Company for equipment supply and commissioning works in India, executed on 17.8.1982 in New Delhi. The agreements stipulated that Indian law would govern the contract and that disputes would be settled through arbitration, with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) rules applying. A dispute led to an interim award made in London, prompting NTPC to seek to set aside the award under the Arbitration Act, 1940. The Delhi High Court ruled that the award was a foreign award under the Foreign Awards Act, 1961, and thus outside its jurisdiction. NTPC appealed, arguing that Indian law governed the arbitration agreement, and therefore Indian courts had jurisdiction. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in its interpretation, asserting that the award was governed by Indian law, including the Arbitration Act, 1940. The court emphasized that the proper law of the contract was Indian law, and the arbitration agreement was not a separate contract but part of the main contract, thus retaining Indian jurisdiction over arbitration matters. The court concluded that the procedural aspects of arbitration could involve English law only to the extent that they did not conflict with Indian law. The appeal was allowed, affirming the jurisdiction of Indian courts over the arbitration agreement and the award (Paras 123-132).

Headnote

A) Arbitration Law - Jurisdiction of Courts - Award Governed by Indian Law - Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 1(2) - The High Court wrongly treated the award as a foreign award; it is governed by Indian law as per the arbitration agreement. The court held that the award is not subject to the Foreign Awards Act due to the specific exclusion in Section 9, thus affirming the jurisdiction of Indian courts over the matter (Paras 132-C).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the award made in London under the arbitration agreement is governed by the Arbitration Act, 1940 or the Foreign Awards Act, 1961.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, ruling that the award was governed by Indian law, including the Arbitration Act, 1940, and that Indian courts had jurisdiction over arbitration matters arising from the contract.

Law Points

  • Arbitration Act
  • 1940
  • Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act
  • 1961
  • proper law of contract
  • jurisdiction of Indian courts
  • international commercial arbitration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1992 LawText (SC) (05) 15

Civil Appeal No. 1978 of 1992

1992-05-07

Thommen, T.K., Agrawal, S.C.

1993 AIR 998, 1992 SCR (3) 106, 1992 SCC (3) 551, JT 1992 (3) 198, 1992 SCALE (1) 1034

Shanti Bhushan, Dr. A.M. Singhvi, C. Mukhopadhaya, J.C. Seth, O.P. Mittal, Sudarsh Menon, G.G. Malhotra, S.K. Dholakia, O.P. Sharma, D.C. Singhania, Ms. Nanita Sharma, Hari Menon, P. Piwany, R.K. Gupta

National Thermal Power Corporation

Singer Company and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the applicability of Indian law to an arbitration award made in London.

Remedy Sought

NTPC sought to set aside the interim award under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

Filing Reason

Dispute arose from contracts for equipment supply and commissioning works.

Previous Decisions

Delhi High Court ruled that the award was a foreign award under the Foreign Awards Act.

Issues

Whether the award is governed by the Arbitration Act, 1940 or the Foreign Awards Act, 1961. What is the proper law governing the arbitration agreement?

Submissions/Arguments

NTPC argued that Indian law governed the arbitration agreement and Indian courts had jurisdiction. Singer contended that the arbitration agreement was a separate contract governed by English law due to the seat of arbitration being in London.

Ratio Decidendi

The award made in London under the arbitration agreement is governed by Indian law as per the parties' explicit agreement, affirming the jurisdiction of Indian courts over arbitration matters.

Judgment Excerpts

The High Court was wrong in treating the award in question as a foreign award. The proper law governing the arbitration agreement is indeed the law in force in India. The parties have the freedom to choose the law governing an international commercial arbitration agreement.

Procedural History

The NTPC filed an application under the Arbitration Act, 1940 to set aside an interim award made in London. The Delhi High Court dismissed the application, leading to the appeal before the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration Act, 1940: Section 1(2), Section 14, Section 30, Section 33
  • Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961: Section 2, Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Condonation of Delay by State in Filing Second Appeal — Emphasizes Need for Sufficient Cause and Due Diligence. The Court held that the State cannot claim any undue indulgence in matters of limitation and must act with due ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty to Pregnant Wife — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections ...